07.03.2017 Views

POLLINATORS POLLINATION AND FOOD PRODUCTION

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE ASSESSMENT REPORT ON <strong>POLLINATORS</strong>, <strong>POLLINATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>FOOD</strong> <strong>PRODUCTION</strong><br />

potential for synergism between the EBI fungicides and<br />

neonicotinoid insecticides (Schmuck et al., 2003; Iwasa<br />

et al., 2004) through the same mechanism, with reported<br />

increases in toxicity up to 500-fold. However, there is also<br />

evidence that the scale of synergism observed is doserelated<br />

with a low or no increase in toxicity at field-realistic<br />

dose levels (Thompson et al., 2014). There is some evidence<br />

that effects in honey bees at the nerve synapse receptor<br />

level between organophosphorus and neonicotinoid<br />

insecticides are additive (Palmer et al., 2013), and effects of<br />

lambda-cyhalothrin and imidacloprid on colony performance<br />

are additive in the bumble bee B. terrestris (Gill et al., 2012),<br />

as may be expected from the differing mode of action of<br />

these compounds. There is also limited evidence of the<br />

interactions between veterinary medicines used in honey<br />

bee colonies, such as varroacides (Johnson et al., 2013)<br />

with some evidence that other classes of pharmaceuticals,<br />

such as antibiotics, interacting with multi-drug resistance<br />

membrane-bound transporter proteins may result in<br />

significantly increased toxicity of varroacides (Hawthorne<br />

and Diveley, 2011).<br />

et al., 2010; Genersch et al., 2010; Chauzat et al., 2011;<br />

Rundlöf et al., 2015), with the most recent statistically<br />

robust field study by Rundlöf et al. 2015 supporting this<br />

conclusion. In some cases (Orantes-Bermejo et al., 2010;<br />

vanEngelsdorp et al., 2010), however, the residues of the<br />

most frequently suspected pesticides (e.g. neonicotinoids)<br />

were not analysed using methodology with sufficiently low<br />

limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantification (LOQ).<br />

In addition, some studies have highlighted fungicides as<br />

a factor affecting honey bee health adversely, although<br />

their role in colony losses have not yet been demonstrated<br />

(vanEngelsdorp et al., 2009a; Simon-Delso et al., 2014).<br />

The mode of action underlying this observation is currently<br />

unclear. There is some evidence that fungicide exposure<br />

may result in decreased nutritional contribution of bee<br />

bread (processed pollen) by reducing the diversity of fungal<br />

spores returned to the hive and by affecting the diversity<br />

and growth of fungi present in bee bread and thus its<br />

fermentation (Yoder et al., 2013).<br />

2.3.2 GMO cultivation<br />

69<br />

2.3.1.6 Evidence of honey bee colony<br />

losses due to pesticide use from<br />

national monitoring programmes<br />

National monitoring approaches have been undertaken<br />

to address directly the role of pesticides in overwintering<br />

honey bee colony losses. To date, these have<br />

concluded that colony loss is a multifactorial issue with the<br />

predominance and combination of different drivers varying<br />

in space and time (section 2.7). There is no clear evidence<br />

that pesticides, particularly the neonicotinoid insecticides,<br />

have directly contributed to these longer-term colony losses<br />

in the EU or US (Chauzat et al., 2006a; Chauzat et al.,<br />

2006b; Chauzat and Faucon, 2007; Chauzat et al., 2009;<br />

Nguyen et al., 2009; vanEngelsdorp et al., 2009b; Chauzat<br />

2.3.2.1 Introduction<br />

Genetically modified (GM) organisms (GMOs) are organisms<br />

that have been modified in a way that does not occur<br />

naturally by mating and/or natural recombination (FAO/<br />

WHO, 2001). One of the most common methods to<br />

do this is by bioengineering transgene(s) into the new<br />

organism. The most common plant transgenes confer<br />

herbicide tolerance (HT), or toxicity towards herbivores<br />

(insect resistance, IR), although other characteristics have<br />

been also engineered (e.g., drought resistance in wheat,<br />

nutritional values in sorghum; James, 2014). As of 2014,<br />

several GM crops were commercialized and grown in 28<br />

countries, representing around 12% of the world’s arable<br />

2. DRIVERS OF CHANGE OF <strong>POLLINATORS</strong>,<br />

<strong>POLLINATION</strong> NETWORKS <strong>AND</strong> <strong>POLLINATION</strong><br />

FIGURE 2.3.8<br />

Distribution and uptake of GM-crop production from<br />

1996 to 2014. Yellow: total hectares; blue: hectares<br />

in industrial countries; red: hectares in developing<br />

countries. Green in map caption: lands growing GMcrops.<br />

Modified from James (2014).<br />

Global area of GM-crops (million hectares)<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014<br />

World total<br />

Industrial countries<br />

Developing countries

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!