07.03.2017 Views

POLLINATORS POLLINATION AND FOOD PRODUCTION

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ASSESSMENT REPORT ON <strong>POLLINATORS</strong>, <strong>POLLINATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>FOOD</strong> <strong>PRODUCTION</strong><br />

186<br />

3. THE STATUS <strong>AND</strong> TRENDS IN <strong>POLLINATORS</strong><br />

<strong>AND</strong> <strong>POLLINATION</strong><br />

temperate regions of the world, particularly of the Northern<br />

Hemisphere. In Sweden, a drastic decrease in bumble<br />

bee diversity has occurred during the last century and<br />

present assemblages are dominated by two short-tongued<br />

species, Bombus terrestris and B. lapidarius (see section<br />

3.2.3). Associated with this shift in bumble-bee community<br />

composition, Bommarco et al. (2012) found declines in<br />

average seed yield of red clover (Trifolium pratense) in recent<br />

years and a long-term trend of yield that was twice as<br />

variable after 90 years. Also, cultivation of some traditional<br />

crops, like mustard (Brassica rapa), has been decreasing in<br />

northern India and Nepal because of declining yields. In this<br />

case, local farmers blame high levels of pesticide application<br />

to crops, and their impact on bees, as the main cause of<br />

reduced yields (Vaissière et al., 2011).<br />

Based on this evidence, large-scale agriculture expansion<br />

should be expected to be associated with decreasing crop<br />

productivity. An analysis of the 54 major crops cultivated<br />

in France over the past two decades found that potential<br />

benefits of agricultural intensification were offset by<br />

increasing pollination deficits, as the mean and predictability<br />

of the yield of pollinator-dependent crops decreased with<br />

increasing intensification (Deguines et al., 2014). However,<br />

at the global scale Ghazoul and Koh (2010) did not find<br />

any consistent relationship between changes in yield in<br />

pollinator-dependent crops and agricultural intensification.<br />

Also, the long-term FAO dataset provides no evidence<br />

so far of a decrease or deceleration in the growth in the<br />

average yield of pollinator-dependent crops compared to<br />

non-dependent crops during the last five decades (Figure<br />

3.13; Aizen et al., 2008). A more detailed analysis confirmed<br />

FIGURE 3.13<br />

no deceleration of yield growth with increasing pollinator<br />

dependency (Garibaldi et al., 2011b), although introduction<br />

of managed pollinators might be masking to some extent<br />

any effect of pollinator decline on crop yield (Potts et al.,<br />

2010). However, the absence of evidence of decreasing or<br />

decelerating agriculture yield over time among pollinationdependent<br />

crops worldwide (Aizen et al., 2008) must not be<br />

taken as proof of an absence of risk of global agriculture to<br />

an on-going or future large-scale pollinator decline.<br />

Further analyses of the FAO dataset revealed that increasing<br />

pollinator dependency is associated with lower and more<br />

variable rates of yield growth (Garibaldi et al., 2011b). These<br />

findings are consistent with the hypothesis that animal<br />

pollination limits the productivity of many crops worldwide,<br />

and stress the vulnerability in the productivity of many crops<br />

to pollination disruption.<br />

Although introduced pollinators can substitute partially<br />

for the pollination provided by declining wild pollinators,<br />

as potentially invasive organisms they can become<br />

superabundant, overexploiting both wild and crop flowers,<br />

and thus reducing reproductive output and agricultural<br />

yield. For instance, the extremely high densities reached<br />

by European B. terrestris in the Patagonia region of South<br />

America (Morales et al., 2013) can be associated with a<br />

marked decrease in raspberry fruit quality via increasing<br />

style damage (Sáez et al., 2014). Also, because the honey<br />

bee, Apis mellifera, harvests large amounts of pollen, the<br />

balance between pollination and pollen theft could shift<br />

with its abundance (Hargreaves et al., 2009). However,<br />

benefits might still be higher than the costs, as in the case<br />

Temporal (1961-2006) trends in mean crop yield. The depicted means (+ or – 1 standard error) in relative yield were estimated from<br />

the subset of 10 pollinator-dependent and 10 non-dependent crops widely cultivated in both the Developed and Developing World<br />

(modified from Aizen et al., 2008).<br />

Percentage change in mean crop yield<br />

Developed world<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

Developing world<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

1 Standard Error<br />

Mean<br />

Dependent<br />

Nondependent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!