07.03.2017 Views

POLLINATORS POLLINATION AND FOOD PRODUCTION

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ASSESSMENT REPORT ON <strong>POLLINATORS</strong>, <strong>POLLINATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>FOOD</strong> <strong>PRODUCTION</strong><br />

164<br />

3. THE STATUS <strong>AND</strong> TRENDS IN <strong>POLLINATORS</strong><br />

<strong>AND</strong> <strong>POLLINATION</strong><br />

there are extensive records available of the phenology of<br />

their migration in the USA and Canada, as observers across<br />

a large latitudinal gradient report their first sightings each<br />

spring (e.g., http://www.hummingbirds.net/map.html).<br />

Habitat loss in their overwintering and summer breeding<br />

grounds, and in the migration corridor, may pose threats to<br />

the migratory species, and there is the potential for effects of<br />

climate change on flowering phenology that may also create<br />

challenges for phenology of migration (McKinney et al.,<br />

2012). Hummingbirds are most diverse in the Neotropical<br />

and important pollinators of that flora, but information on<br />

population trends are completely lacking.<br />

Bird occurrence has been monitored in South Africa in two<br />

large citizen science projects, the first Southern African<br />

Bird Atlas Project (SABAP1: 1987-1991) and the second<br />

Southern African Bird Atlas Project (SABAP2: 2007-present);<br />

data at http://www.gbif.org/dataset/282d0ccb-4fa0-<br />

40f9-8593-105c77e88417. A recent comparison of these<br />

two data sets finds that the families Pycnonotidae and<br />

Ploceidae, which include nectar as a small component of<br />

their diet, have increased in abundance in 66% and 61%<br />

of geographical grid cells respectively, whereas the families<br />

Nectariniidae (Sunbirds) and Promeropidae (Sugarbirds),<br />

both of which include nectar as a major component of<br />

their diet, have increased in 52% and 33% of grid cells<br />

respectively. Because very few grid cells remain unchanged,<br />

these data indicated that the Promeropidae show a decline<br />

in about 67% of grid cells (Loftie-Eaton, 2014).<br />

Bats are another important and diverse group of vertebrate<br />

pollinators in many parts of the world (Fleming and Mucchala,<br />

2008). Population estimates are available for a few species<br />

of pollinating bats, but in general little is known about<br />

trends, in part because they are difficult to survey (http://<br />

digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/35/). In some areas<br />

bats are important pollinators of food resources, such as<br />

cactus fruits in Mexico (Arias-Cóyotl et al., 2006), agave<br />

species (including those used for tequila and mezcal) (Rocha,<br />

2005; Trejo-Salazar et al., 2015), species of mango, wild<br />

species of banana, durian, and guava (http://www.bats.org.<br />

uk/pages/why_bats_matter.html). The migratory species in<br />

Central and North America face many of the same challenges<br />

described above for migratory hummingbirds, as well as the<br />

additional constraint of needing caves for roosting (Slauson,<br />

2000). One study found that an island population of a<br />

columnar cactus may be moving toward insect pollination<br />

because of a paucity of bats, possibly a consequence of<br />

hurricanes (Rivera-Marchand and Ackerman, 2006).<br />

Pollinator extinction, reintroduction, and<br />

replacement<br />

Local and global extinctions of pollinators have occurred<br />

(Cox and Elmqvist, 2000; Cameron et al., 2011), and some<br />

conservation efforts have been implemented to re-introduce<br />

missing species or replace their functions as pollinators.<br />

An example of re-introduction (See Chapter 6 for additional<br />

information on re-introductions) is the case of the United<br />

Kingdom bumble bee species Bombus subterraneus, which<br />

was declared extinct in the UK in 2000. An initial attempt<br />

to use queens from New Zealand in 2011 for reintroduction<br />

was unsuccessful (Howlett et al., 2009). However, a<br />

subsequent programme to reintroduce B. subterraneus<br />

with queens from Sweden is ongoing following restoration<br />

of appropriate habitat and food plants (Gammans, 2013),<br />

and although workers have been observed, production<br />

and successful overwintering of queens has not yet been<br />

proved. This re-introduction protocol developed for B.<br />

subterraneus in the UK may be useful in other parts of<br />

the world experiencing similar bumble bee extinctions<br />

(e.g., B. occidentalis in parts of its former range in North<br />

America) (Cameron et al., 2011). A fortuitous replacement<br />

of pollination occurred in Hawaii, where the introduced<br />

Japanese White-eye (Zosterops japonica) assumed the<br />

role of extinct bird species as a pollinator of the ieie vine<br />

(Freycinetia arborea) (Cox, 1983).<br />

The current status of almost all wild pollinator populations<br />

is unclear and difficult to assess due to the lack of data.<br />

TABLE 3.1<br />

Data on migratory hummingbird population trends from 1966 – 2012 from the Breeding Bird Survey data from USA and<br />

Canada. Means for number of birds observed per survey route are shown with 95% Confidence Intervals.<br />

From http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/ (data retrieved 15 September 2015).<br />

Common name Species USA annual trend (N) Canada annual trend (N)<br />

Ruby-throated Hummingbird Archilochus colubris +1.6 (1,910) CI 1.3 – 1.8 +2.2 (387) first yr 1968 CI 1.3<br />

– 3.0<br />

Black-chinned Hummingbird Archilochus alexandri +1.1 (418) CI 0.2 – 1.9 +0.2 (10) CI -5.4 – 6.6<br />

Anna's Hummingbird Calypte anna +2.0 (220) CI 1.3 – 2.7<br />

Costa's Hummingbird Calypte costae -1.9 (99) CI -6.0 – 1.1<br />

Calliope Hummingbird Stellula calliope -1.0 (168) CI -2.3 – 0.2 0.9 (52) CI -0.6 – 2.5<br />

Rufous Hummingbird Selasphorus rufus -2.3 (214) CI -3.0 – -1.5 -1.9 (131) CI -3.1 – -1.6<br />

Allen's Hummingbird Selasphorus sasin -4.1 (55) CI -5.7 – - 2.6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!