07.03.2017 Views

POLLINATORS POLLINATION AND FOOD PRODUCTION

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE ASSESSMENT REPORT ON <strong>POLLINATORS</strong>, <strong>POLLINATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>FOOD</strong> <strong>PRODUCTION</strong><br />

6.2.1 An overview of direct risks<br />

associated with pollinator decline<br />

Table 6.2.2 summarises the evidence included in this<br />

assessment for each of the direct impacts listed in Table<br />

6.2.1, including whether and where the impact is known<br />

to be happening. Based on this information, we categorise<br />

the direct impacts into those that pose an immediate risk<br />

to people and livelihoods at least somewhere in the world<br />

(immediate risk), those that do not pose an immediate risk<br />

but could develop in the longer term (future risk), and those<br />

for which we do not have sufficient knowledge to assess the<br />

risk, even conceptually (unknown).<br />

6.2.1.1 Linking risks to drivers<br />

Table 6.2.3 shows the main drivers associated with the<br />

risks identified. The drivers listed are those most frequently<br />

selected as one of the ‘two or three main drivers’ by<br />

the Lead Authors and Co-ordinating Lead Authors, in<br />

an anonymous individual consultation exercise. Of the<br />

drivers discussed in Chapter 2, changes in land cover and<br />

spatial configuration (2.1.1), land management (2.1.2), and<br />

pesticides (2.2.1) are the most prominent drivers of risks<br />

associated with pollinator decline.<br />

Kuldna et al. (2009) also found that land use practices<br />

and agrochemicals were regarded as the most significant<br />

pressures on pollinators, using a combination of literature<br />

review and expert judgement.<br />

6.2.1.2 Other perspectives on risk<br />

A report by the International Risk Governance Council<br />

(IRGC, 2009) identified a number of barriers, or<br />

‘governance deficits’ that prevent effective governance<br />

of the risks related to pollination. These barriers can be<br />

summarised as: scientific uncertainty, lack of economic<br />

mechanisms, inadequate land use policies, inadequate<br />

stakeholder consultation, and lack of long-term planning.<br />

All these barriers persist to some extent, but this chapter<br />

demonstrates progress towards reducing them. Research<br />

funding has reduced scientific uncertainty (section 6.4.6),<br />

there are examples of stakeholder participation and<br />

communication around the world (6.4.1, 6.4.4, 6.4.6 and<br />

6.5), and a range of economic methods and mechanisms<br />

have been developed, and tested or established in some<br />

regions (Chapter 4 and Section 6.5.1.5).<br />

impacts in our list. According to the report, pollinator<br />

decline is likely to affect cash flow for some companies with<br />

exposure to agricultural produce, due to impacts on raw<br />

material prices, but it concludes that pollinator decline is<br />

more significant at national and farm levels than at the level<br />

of the global economy.<br />

6.2.2 Opportunities to benefit<br />

pollinators and improve<br />

pollination<br />

It is beyond the scope of this report to review evidence for<br />

the social or economic benefits that underlie many of the<br />

opportunities listed in Table 6.2.1. However, evidence for<br />

the likelihood of some of these opportunities comes from<br />

what we know about the effectiveness of the responses,<br />

and is described in the rest of this chapter.<br />

Section 6.4.1, Agriculture, horticulture and forestry<br />

practices, compiles what is known about the likelihood<br />

of improved or more stable yields, reduced reliance on<br />

managed pollinators, diversified income and premium<br />

prices, and more economically sustainable agriculture in<br />

the long term, following action on pollinators. Section 6.4.2<br />

Pesticides and pollutants provides information on reduced<br />

environmental hazards associated with agriculture, which<br />

could contribute to maintaining wild pollinator and plant<br />

diversity, and generate improved conditions and habitats for<br />

other species. Section 6.4.3 Nature conservation discusses<br />

the likelihood that better biodiversity conservation overall<br />

is associated with pollinator management. Section 6.4.4,<br />

Pollinator management and beekeeping, discusses what is<br />

known about the likelihood of increased production of honey<br />

and bee products from better management of pollinators.<br />

Finally, section 6.7 Trade-offs and synergies in decisions<br />

about pollination¸ discusses the evidence on whether<br />

mitigating pollinator decline and active management of<br />

pollination enhances other ecosystem services through<br />

synergy.<br />

We can also use this assessment to identify responses<br />

that have been established and shown to be effective.<br />

These may represent opportunities to act in other places or<br />

contexts, if there are appropriate resources available, and<br />

suitable openings in the policy cycle. These responses are<br />

shown in bold, in Table 6.9.1.<br />

371<br />

6. RESPONSES TO RISKS <strong>AND</strong> OPPORTUNITIES ASSOCIATED<br />

WITH <strong>POLLINATORS</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>POLLINATION</strong><br />

In 2014, the global asset management firm Schroders<br />

Investment Management Ltd. published a report on the<br />

economic and corporate significance of pollinator decline<br />

(Stathers, 2014). The report provides an insight into global<br />

business perceptions of the first two food production

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!