07.03.2017 Views

POLLINATORS POLLINATION AND FOOD PRODUCTION

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE ASSESSMENT REPORT ON <strong>POLLINATORS</strong>, <strong>POLLINATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>FOOD</strong> <strong>PRODUCTION</strong><br />

162<br />

3. THE STATUS <strong>AND</strong> TRENDS IN <strong>POLLINATORS</strong><br />

<strong>AND</strong> <strong>POLLINATION</strong><br />

of plants from 172 families have been reported as being<br />

visited by flies (Kearns, 2001, 2002; Inouye et al., 2015). One<br />

species is even available commercially for pollination; Lucilia<br />

sericata (common green bottle fly) are available as “Natufly”.<br />

Flies are particularly important at high latitudes (Totland,<br />

1993; Woodcock et al., 2014) and high altitudes, especially<br />

in areas where bumble bees are not present, such as alpine<br />

Australia (Inouye and Pyke, 1988).<br />

Despite their obvious importance, there are very few data<br />

available on population sizes and trends. Keil et al. (2011)<br />

looked for temporal change in species richness of hoverflies<br />

(Syrphidae) from the UK and the Netherlands, comparing<br />

museum specimen data prior to and post 1980. They were<br />

particularly interested in the effects of spatial scale, and<br />

compared grid resolutions from 10 x10 km to 160x160 km.<br />

Trends differed across spatial scales, but species richness<br />

increased in the Netherlands and decreased in the UK at<br />

the fine scale (10x1 0km), while trends differed between<br />

countries at the coarsest scale (positive in UK, no change<br />

in Netherlands). Thus Keil et al. (2011) concluded that<br />

explicit considerations of spatial (and temporal) scale are<br />

essential in studies documenting past biodiversity change or<br />

attempting to forecast future changes.<br />

The Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (Rhaphiomidas<br />

terminatus abdominalis) is one of the most endangered<br />

animals on the planet and was listed under the US<br />

Endangered Species Act in 1993 (http://www.xerces.org/<br />

delhi-sands-flower-loving-fly/). It is a habitat specialist, and<br />

the dunes where it occurs in southern California have largely<br />

disappeared due to development. The flies collect nectar<br />

of at least one plant in that habitat (Eriogonum fasiculatum)<br />

(U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1997).<br />

Iler et al. (2013) analysed a 20-year record of Syrphidae from<br />

a Malaise trap maintained at the Rocky Mountain Biological<br />

Laboratory (2,900 m altitude in Colorado, USA). Their primary<br />

focus was on phenology of fly emergence (several species),<br />

for which they found no significant trend, suggesting that<br />

the historic interaction with food plants is being maintained<br />

in the face of climate change. A 15-yr study of Syrphidae<br />

in the UK (Owen, 1989) found that hoverfly populations<br />

are more stable than those of other terrestrial arthropods,<br />

that there are strong correlations (r=0.51-0.54, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!