07.03.2017 Views

POLLINATORS POLLINATION AND FOOD PRODUCTION

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ASSESSMENT REPORT ON <strong>POLLINATORS</strong>, <strong>POLLINATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>FOOD</strong> <strong>PRODUCTION</strong><br />

CHAPTER 3<br />

THE STATUS <strong>AND</strong> TRENDS<br />

IN <strong>POLLINATORS</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>POLLINATION</strong><br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

Many wild bees and butterflies have been declining<br />

in abundance, occurrence and diversity at local and<br />

regional scales, as it has been recorded in North<br />

West Europe and North America (established but<br />

incomplete). Loss of pollinators has negative impacts<br />

on the reproduction of wild plants (established but<br />

incomplete). In agricultural systems, the local abundance<br />

and diversity of wild bees have been found to decline<br />

strongly with distance from field margins and remnants<br />

of natural and semi natural habitat at scales of a few<br />

hundred metres (well established) (3.2.2, 3.2.3). At larger<br />

spatial scales, declines in bee diversity and shrinkage of<br />

geographical ranges, e.g. of bumble bees, have been<br />

recorded in highly industrialized regions of the world,<br />

particularly Europe and North America, over the last century<br />

(well established). Beyond records of species-specific<br />

population declines, e.g. Franklin’s bumble bee (Bombus<br />

franklini) in Western USA and the giant bumble bee (Bombus<br />

dahlbomii) in Southern South America, trends are mainly<br />

unknown for other regions and continents because of a<br />

lack of baseline datasets and monitoring schemes (3.2.3).<br />

Declines have been also recorded in other insect pollinator<br />

groups, such as butterflies and moths, and among some<br />

vertebrate pollinators, particularly hummingbirds and<br />

bats (established but incomplete) (3.2.1, 3.2.2). Local<br />

declines in pollinator abundance and diversity have been<br />

linked to decreasing trends in wild plant pollination and<br />

seed production in habitat fragments (well established),<br />

and to declines in the diversity of pollinator-dependent<br />

wild plant species at regional scales (established but<br />

incomplete) (3.6.3).<br />

The International Union for Conservation of<br />

Nature (IUCN) Red List assessments indicate<br />

that<br />

16.5 per cent of vertebrate pollinators are threatened<br />

with global extinction (increasing to 30 per cent<br />

for island species). There are no global Red List<br />

assessments specifically for insect pollinators.<br />

However, regional and national assessments indicate<br />

high levels of threat for some bees and butterflies. In<br />

Europe, 9% of bees and butterfly species are threatened<br />

and populations are declining for 37% of bees and 31% of<br />

butterflies (excluding data deficient species, which includes<br />

57% of bees). Where national Red List assessments are<br />

available, they show that often more than 40 per cent of bee<br />

species may be threatened (3.2.1, 3.2.3).<br />

Large and well-connected plant-pollinator networks,<br />

i.e., those with many links between the plants and<br />

pollinators, are needed to guarantee satisfactory<br />

levels of pollination for wild plants and crops, as<br />

well as sufficient availability of food for pollinators<br />

(established but incomplete). Wild and domestic<br />

pollinators involved in crop pollination also require floral<br />

resources provided by wild plants (well established).<br />

Therefore, large, and well-connected plant-pollinator<br />

networks are associated with viable populations and diverse<br />

communities of pollinators (established but incomplete).<br />

Habitat disturbance tends to lead to loss of interaction links<br />

and species from plant-pollinator networks (established but<br />

incomplete) (3.5.2, 3.5.3).<br />

There is a loss of indigenous and local knowledge<br />

and sustainable bee management practices within<br />

local communities (established but incomplete). Shifts<br />

in social systems, cultural values, and accelerated loss of<br />

natural habitats have been associated with a decrease in<br />

the transfer of knowledge within and between generations.<br />

This has led to a decline in stingless bee husbandry in the<br />

Americas and Africa and changes in habitat management<br />

for wild honey bee species in Asia by local and indigenous<br />

communities (established but incomplete). Whether this has<br />

led to loss of pollination of crops and wild flowering plants<br />

remains unknown (3.9.1).<br />

The number of managed western honey bee hives<br />

is increasing at the global scale, although seasonal<br />

colony loss is high in some European countries and<br />

in North America (well established). FAO data show<br />

that the number of western honey bee hives has increased<br />

globally by about 50% over the last five decades, despite<br />

a temporary drop during the 1990s after the dissolution of<br />

the Soviet Union and Eastern-European Soviet Bloc (well<br />

established). It is unknown whether this decline is an artefact<br />

of how data were collected and reported, or the result of<br />

a true decrease in honey bee hives that resulted from the<br />

political and economic disruption caused by the Soviet<br />

collapse (unresolved). FAO data also show that national<br />

trends vary widely among countries, with contrasting trends<br />

153<br />

3. THE STATUS <strong>AND</strong> TRENDS IN <strong>POLLINATORS</strong><br />

<strong>AND</strong> <strong>POLLINATION</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!