07.03.2017 Views

POLLINATORS POLLINATION AND FOOD PRODUCTION

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

individual_chapters_pollination_20170305

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ASSESSMENT REPORT ON <strong>POLLINATORS</strong>, <strong>POLLINATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>FOOD</strong> <strong>PRODUCTION</strong><br />

6.4.6.1 Summary of experience across<br />

sectors<br />

Across the policy sectors in this section (agriculture,<br />

pesticides, nature conservation, managed pollinators and<br />

urban/transport infrastructure), some common themes<br />

emerge about available responses and the evidence for<br />

their effectiveness.<br />

Technical responses are the most widely established and the<br />

most scientifically tested. For many of those relating to land<br />

management, such as planting flowers, or restoring seminatural<br />

habitat, there is high confidence in positive effects<br />

on pollinators themselves, with many studies showing that<br />

pollinators make use of new resources provided for them<br />

(biodiversity). There is much less evidence of longer-term<br />

effects on pollinator populations, and limited evidence of<br />

effects on pollination.<br />

Economic and legal responses tend to be established, with<br />

some evidence of impacts on pollinators and pollination.<br />

Regulatory control through obligatory registration and<br />

standards (legal responses) are most strongly established<br />

in the pesticides sector (6.4.2), and there is evidence they<br />

reduce risks to pollinators. Among economic market-based<br />

instruments, voluntary incentives such as certification or agrienvironment<br />

schemes are established in some regions in the<br />

agriculture and managed pollinator sectors (6.4.1 and 6.4.4).<br />

Taxes, which are obligatory market-based instruments, have<br />

been proposed to discourage pesticide use, but not tested.<br />

Social/behavioural responses, even those that are<br />

established, seldom have robust evidence of effectiveness.<br />

Many examples come from indigenous and traditional<br />

knowledge, such as voluntary codes of practice among<br />

farming and beekeeping communities and community<br />

groups working together (6.4.1 and 6.4.4).<br />

412<br />

TABLE 6.4.5<br />

Summary of evidence for responses relating to nature conservation<br />

6. RESPONSES TO RISKS <strong>AND</strong> OPPORTUNITIES ASSOCIATED<br />

WITH <strong>POLLINATORS</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>POLLINATION</strong><br />

Response Main Drivers Type of response Status Scientific evidence<br />

Manage or restore native habitat<br />

patches to support pollinators<br />

Increase connectivity of habitat<br />

patches<br />

Manage invasive species (plants,<br />

pests, predators or pollinators)<br />

that diminish pollinators or<br />

pollinator habitat<br />

Targeted conservation of<br />

specific pollinator species or<br />

groups of species (includes ex<br />

situ conservation of threatened<br />

species, includes species of<br />

special cultural value)<br />

Targeted conservation of<br />

pollinators associated with<br />

specific plant species threatened<br />

by pollination deficit<br />

Establish protected areas or<br />

improve the quality of existing<br />

ones (including protected areas<br />

of cultural value)<br />

Payment for ecosystem services<br />

Maintain sacred and other<br />

culturally protected areas that<br />

support pollinators<br />

Increase taxonomic expertise<br />

on pollinator groups (formal<br />

education/training) and<br />

technology to support discovery<br />

and identification<br />

Land use and its changes<br />

(2.1)<br />

Changes in land cover<br />

and spatial configuration<br />

(2.1.2)<br />

Technical<br />

6.4.3.1.1.<br />

Technical<br />

6.4.3.1.2.<br />

Invasive species Technical<br />

6.4.3.1.4.<br />

Multiple, interacting<br />

threats<br />

Multiple, interacting<br />

threats<br />

Land use and its changes<br />

(2.1)<br />

Land use and its changes<br />

(2.1)<br />

Land use and its changes<br />

(2.1)<br />

All<br />

Technical<br />

6.4.3.1.5.<br />

Technical<br />

6.4.3.1.5.<br />

Established<br />

Tested<br />

Tested<br />

Tested<br />

Tested<br />

Increases diversity and abundance of<br />

pollinating insects<br />

WELL ESTABLISHED<br />

Some evidence that habitat<br />

connections help pollinator movement<br />

and gene flow<br />

ESTABLISHED BUT INCOMPLETE<br />

Case study evidence of some benefits<br />

to pollinator species, but eradication is<br />

difficult to achieve<br />

ESTABLISHED BUT INCOMPLETE<br />

Examples exist for a limited range of<br />

taxa<br />

ESTABLISHED BUT INCOMPLETE<br />

One European example known, for<br />

dittany<br />

(Dictamnus albus)<br />

INCONCLUSIVE<br />

Legal 6.4.3.2.2 Established Protected areas host species diversity,<br />

but it is difficult to determine the<br />

impact of legislation in achieving<br />

protection<br />

WELL ESTABLISHED<br />

Economic 6.4.3.3. Tested Ecosystems services payments have<br />

been established for other services<br />

(watershed protection, carbon<br />

sequestration) but no examples for<br />

pollination<br />

ESTABLISHED BUT INCOMPLETE<br />

Social/Behavioural<br />

6.4.3.2.2<br />

Knowledge<br />

6.4.3.5.<br />

Established<br />

Tested<br />

Protected areas host species diversity,<br />

but few case studies<br />

ESTABLISHED BUT INCOMPLETE<br />

(see also 5.4.2.4)<br />

Significant training has been achieved<br />

in a number of countries<br />

WELL ESTABLISHED

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!