28.11.2017 Views

Child-and-adult-labour-in-the-export-oriented-garment-and-gem-polishing-industry-of-India

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62<br />

<strong>Child</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>adult</strong> <strong>labour</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>garment</strong> <strong>export</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>of</strong> Tirupur<br />

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────<br />

In my op<strong>in</strong>ion, <strong>the</strong> Government, <strong>in</strong> its actions to end child <strong>labour</strong>, should not allow only<br />

employers to f<strong>in</strong>d alternatives for child <strong>labour</strong>ers by provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m education or expect<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

employers that <strong>the</strong>y would send <strong>the</strong> children to school etc.; it should make use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir will<strong>in</strong>g<br />

attitude to change <strong>the</strong> situation but take <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> programmes <strong>in</strong> its own h<strong>and</strong>s. As<br />

long as <strong>the</strong> Government does not implement its laws related to child <strong>labour</strong>, <strong>and</strong> does not<br />

regularly check employers on compliance with (child) <strong>labour</strong> legislation like <strong>the</strong> <strong>Child</strong> Labour<br />

(P&R) Act, not much can be expected <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> (phased) elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> regulation <strong>of</strong> child <strong>labour</strong><br />

by employers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>export</strong>-<strong>oriented</strong> hosiery <strong>in</strong>dustry who have an <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> cheap <strong>labour</strong>. Even<br />

less can be expected <strong>of</strong> non-formal education <strong>and</strong> regulation <strong>of</strong> child <strong>labour</strong> because <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

<strong>of</strong> work <strong>and</strong> school makes children too tired. They have little concentration left to follow <strong>the</strong><br />

lessons. The Government should put more emphasis on compliance with <strong>labour</strong> laws through an<br />

improved <strong>and</strong> more strict enforcement mach<strong>in</strong>ery. Labour <strong>in</strong>spectors should visit <strong>the</strong> units more<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> violat<strong>in</strong>g employers immediately accord<strong>in</strong>g to what <strong>the</strong> law has prescribed.<br />

Employers, now open<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> discussions perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> evil <strong>of</strong> child <strong>labour</strong>, should try<br />

harder to cooperate <strong>and</strong> refuse to employ children. Labour related laws like <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>imum Wage<br />

Act, if enforced, would give workers a m<strong>in</strong>imum wage <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r statutory benefits, which <strong>the</strong><br />

majority <strong>of</strong> workers is not gett<strong>in</strong>g at present. If enforced, <strong>labour</strong> related legislation would improve<br />

<strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>labour</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>adult</strong> workers; <strong>the</strong> parents <strong>of</strong> child <strong>labour</strong>ers. This would<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> need to send <strong>the</strong> child to work for extra <strong>in</strong>come. Parents <strong>of</strong> child <strong>labour</strong>ers who do not<br />

work <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hosiery <strong>in</strong>dustry or who are unemployed, should ei<strong>the</strong>r be tra<strong>in</strong>ed or should be<br />

employed <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come-generat<strong>in</strong>g programmes which will raise <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>come to a 'need based' wage.<br />

4.8 Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

- The pull factors which partly caused child <strong>labour</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hosiery <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> Tirupur were: <strong>the</strong><br />

structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry - a fragmented production process (job work<strong>in</strong>g) which allowed<br />

manufacturers to violate (child) <strong>labour</strong> laws <strong>and</strong> led to <strong>the</strong> employment <strong>of</strong> many children who<br />

were tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> simple skills <strong>in</strong> a short time period - <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. The push<br />

factors which partly caused child <strong>labour</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hosiery <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>of</strong> Tirupur were: <strong>the</strong> relatively<br />

high wages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> child <strong>labour</strong>ers, <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> poor <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequate primary education facilities<br />

<strong>in</strong> Tirupur, poverty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parents who ei<strong>the</strong>r were unemployed, who had low <strong>in</strong>come jobs,<br />

or who had a ill family member, <strong>and</strong> migration <strong>of</strong> families to Tirupur - <strong>the</strong> moment children were<br />

withdrawn from school <strong>and</strong> never enroled aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Tirupur.<br />

- The <strong>in</strong>terviewed child <strong>labour</strong>ers were from <strong>the</strong> Backward Caste <strong>and</strong> Scheduled Tribes<br />

Communities. The majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> children was migrant from surround<strong>in</strong>g drought prone rural<br />

areas. The reason for migration was <strong>of</strong>ten debt <strong>of</strong> parents <strong>and</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> job opportunities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> village,<br />

<strong>and</strong> better job opportunities <strong>in</strong> Tirupur.<br />

- The <strong>in</strong>terviewed child <strong>labour</strong>ers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hosiery <strong>in</strong>dustry started work<strong>in</strong>g at an age that ranged<br />

from 7 to 12 years. The age range <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviewed child <strong>labour</strong>ers was between 10 <strong>and</strong> 13<br />

years. The wages <strong>of</strong> children were ei<strong>the</strong>r paid per day, week or accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> piece rate system.<br />

The wages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> child <strong>labour</strong>ers ranged from Rs 13 to Rs 28 per day (Rs 338 to Rs 728 per

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!