24.12.2012 Views

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DA AVATAR, DA BOMB, DA BUM 143<br />

sight which one might have been tempted to credit him from 1996,<br />

and explicitly stating that he had not renounced his view of (or<br />

love for, or devotion toward) Da as Realizer. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, he argued<br />

simply that Da’s “World Teacher” status enjoindered upon him <strong>the</strong><br />

maintaining of a presence in <strong>the</strong> world, and <strong>the</strong> initiation of an<br />

“even more aggressive outreach program” by <strong>the</strong> community, as<br />

opposed to his ongoing seclusion.<br />

An “even more aggressive outreach program.” To put a positive<br />

spin on a “problematic” situation, and “spread <strong>the</strong> word” to more<br />

people, <strong>the</strong>reby doing more harm? Or perhaps simply to warn potential<br />

devotees as to “what <strong>the</strong>y’re getting <strong>the</strong>mselves into,” as if<br />

that would <strong>the</strong>n clear up all of <strong>the</strong> reported problems with <strong>the</strong><br />

community? (Would “Jim Jones with a warning label” have been<br />

<strong>the</strong> solution to his “problematic” craziness?)<br />

Again, as posters in Bob (2000)—<strong>the</strong>mselves making no claim<br />

to genius, but clearly adept in common sense—have insightfully<br />

(and independently) pointed out:<br />

I find it absurd that Wilber seems to attach more importance<br />

to criticizing Da’s failure to appear in public forums than he<br />

does to examining <strong>the</strong> very serious [alleged] abuses of trust<br />

and misuse of power that have [reportedly] been perpetrated<br />

by Da under <strong>the</strong> guise of spiritual teaching. In light of <strong>the</strong><br />

well-documented [reported] problems that Da has created in<br />

his own life and his follower’s [sic] lives, it is completely irrelevant<br />

to any evaluation of Da whe<strong>the</strong>r or not he accepts<br />

Ken’s challenge to go out into <strong>the</strong> world at large. Who cares!<br />

Why would anyone want to see Da broaden his influence by<br />

speaking to a larger audience?<br />

Precisely.<br />

The full text of Wilber’s aforementioned (1998a) open letter to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Daist Community is eminently worth reading, toward one’s<br />

own disillusion regarding <strong>the</strong> caliber of advice given by even <strong>the</strong><br />

“brightest lights” in <strong>the</strong> spiritual marketplace. To summarize its<br />

contents: Wilber states that he nei<strong>the</strong>r regrets nor retracts his past<br />

endorsements of Adi Da; that it is only for cultural and legal considerations<br />

(i.e., for evident protection when “Da Shit hits Da Fan”)<br />

that he can no longer publicly give a blanket recommendation for<br />

people to follow Da; that he is pleased that his own writings have<br />

brought people to Da Avatar and hopes that <strong>the</strong>y will continue to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!