24.12.2012 Views

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GURUS AND PRISONERS 377<br />

By <strong>the</strong> end of Zimbardo’s study, four of his twelve prisoners had<br />

experienced “extreme emotional depression, crying, rage and acute<br />

anxiety,” to <strong>the</strong> point of needing to be removed from <strong>the</strong> study for<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own good. (Those breakdowns were later interpreted by <strong>the</strong><br />

experimenters as being a “passive way of demanding attention and<br />

help.” Still, <strong>the</strong>y were certainly real to <strong>the</strong> persons experiencing<br />

<strong>the</strong>m, regardless of what <strong>the</strong> subconscious motivations might have<br />

been.) A fifth developed a psychosomatic rash on portions of his<br />

body (Haney, et al., 1973).<br />

The prisoners who adapted better to <strong>the</strong> situation were those<br />

who mindlessly followed orders and who allowed <strong>the</strong> guards<br />

to dehumanize and degrade <strong>the</strong>m ever more with each passing<br />

day and night (Zimbardo, 2004b).<br />

Compared with those who had to be released, prisoners who<br />

remained in prison until <strong>the</strong> termination of <strong>the</strong> study ...<br />

scored higher on conformity (“acceptance of society as it is”)<br />

(Haney, et al., 1973).<br />

On a psychological test designed to reveal a person’s authoritarianism,<br />

those prisoners who had <strong>the</strong> highest scores were<br />

best able to function in this authoritarian prison environment<br />

(Zimbardo, et al., 1973).<br />

Dr. Zimbardo fur<strong>the</strong>r characterized <strong>the</strong> prisoners in general,<br />

by <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> experiment, as simply “hanging on ... much like<br />

hospitalized mental patients,” blindly obeying <strong>the</strong> commands of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir guards.<br />

Loyal, beaten-down disciples, of course, “hang on” in much <strong>the</strong><br />

same way. And, as <strong>the</strong> SRF monk implicitly noted, <strong>the</strong> ones who<br />

stay and adapt <strong>the</strong> best are, more often than not, exactly <strong>the</strong> ones<br />

who are able to “mindlessly follow orders,” being free of <strong>the</strong> “delusive<br />

evil” of independence. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, as judged by <strong>the</strong>ir high authoritarianism<br />

scores in Zimbardo’s study, those order-following<br />

ones are <strong>the</strong> very same individuals who most enjoy sitting in authority<br />

over o<strong>the</strong>rs. Put ano<strong>the</strong>r way: The ones who send <strong>the</strong> deepest<br />

bows to <strong>the</strong>ir own overlords (“divine” or o<strong>the</strong>rwise) also typically<br />

crave and insist on <strong>the</strong> most respect and obedience from o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

Even without experimental confirmation, one could easily have<br />

discerned that dynamic simply in common sense from one’s daily<br />

observations of o<strong>the</strong>rs. That, at least, has been my own experience.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!