24.12.2012 Views

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

392 STRIPPING THE GURUS<br />

<strong>the</strong> bathroom activities and food intake of <strong>the</strong>ir prisoners, attempting<br />

force-feeding on at least one occasion.<br />

Comparably:<br />

I wasn’t long in <strong>the</strong> [Irish Sisters of Charity orphanage] and<br />

<strong>the</strong>re was a piece of parsnip in my dinner, and it was dirty. I<br />

politely put it to one side of my plate, and ate everything<br />

else. The nun came down and told me to eat <strong>the</strong> parsnip. I<br />

said no. So she force fed it to me, and I got sick. Then she<br />

force fed that to me as well. And she started to beat me with<br />

her belt (Raftery and O’Sullivan, 2001).<br />

Note, <strong>the</strong>n, how <strong>the</strong> sadistic behavior is exactly <strong>the</strong> same<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r coming from women or from men. That is, <strong>the</strong> fact that all<br />

of Zimbardo’s guards and prisoners were male is not, in practice,<br />

relevant. (The mixture of <strong>the</strong> sexes in Abu Ghraib likewise did not<br />

prevent female guards <strong>the</strong>re from allegedly being among <strong>the</strong> worst<br />

abusers of power.)<br />

Zimbardo’s “bad” guards enacted <strong>the</strong>ir sadistic and controlling<br />

behaviors not for having been told to do so by him. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

evolved those means of control on <strong>the</strong>ir own. That is, like <strong>the</strong> Irish<br />

nuns above, <strong>the</strong>y behaved thusly not because <strong>the</strong>y were directly<br />

told to by an authority figure, but ra<strong>the</strong>r just because <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

allowed to.<br />

Consider fur<strong>the</strong>r that in Zimbardo’s study, <strong>the</strong> power was divided<br />

up more or less evenly among <strong>the</strong> guards. Had Zimbardo not<br />

been <strong>the</strong>re at all (as superintendent), one can easily see that <strong>the</strong><br />

division of power among <strong>the</strong> guards would have been just as equal.<br />

Yet things could only have gotten worse, faster. The point, <strong>the</strong>n, is<br />

that a group of people with absolute or near-absolute authority is<br />

no better than is a single individual with <strong>the</strong> same power.<br />

Nor would such a group act to enforce “checks and balances”<br />

on each o<strong>the</strong>r at <strong>the</strong>ir own level. For, Zimbardo’s “good” guards,<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than constraining <strong>the</strong> activities of <strong>the</strong>ir “bad” counterparts,<br />

simply felt helpless in watching <strong>the</strong> sadistic behaviors of <strong>the</strong> latter.<br />

How are we to understand why o<strong>the</strong>rwise-reasonable and<br />

healthy men would behave so impotently? First, we may note that<br />

it is typical of human behavior that, in witnessing any objectionable<br />

activity from within a group of comparable onlookers, we assume<br />

that “someone else” will speak up or “call <strong>the</strong> police,” if that<br />

needs to be done. Indeed, it has actually been shown in controlled<br />

studies that we are less likely to intervene if we are surrounded by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!