24.12.2012 Views

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

364 STRIPPING THE GURUS<br />

Each of <strong>the</strong> dozen prisoners had been assigned a number in<br />

place of his name upon entering, and was referred to only by that<br />

number, in a tactic designed to make him feel anonymous and to<br />

dissociate him from his pre-incarceration identity. That is, he was<br />

not to have that past as a guide for how to behave, or as a reference<br />

for what would be appropriate treatment of himself, for instance.<br />

Monks and sannyasis are, of course, frequently subjected to a<br />

similar change of name. In Rajneesh’s ashrams, as an extreme example,<br />

that was often effected within mere days (or less) of <strong>the</strong> individual’s<br />

acceptance of Bhagwan as a teacher, even for persons<br />

not entering into long-term residence <strong>the</strong>re. (Uniforms—e.g., of<br />

Rajneesh’s saffron-wearing “orange” followers—have <strong>the</strong> same effect<br />

of “deindividuation” on <strong>the</strong>ir wearers.)<br />

Living among strangers who do not know your name or history<br />

... dressed in a uniform exactly like all o<strong>the</strong>r prisoners<br />

[or monks], not wanting to call attention to one’s self because<br />

of <strong>the</strong> unpredictable consequences it might provoke [with<br />

those being given as “discipline for one’s ego,” in <strong>the</strong> ashram]<br />

—all led to a weakening of self-identity among <strong>the</strong> prisoners<br />

(Haney, et al., 1973).<br />

Following a brief rebellion on <strong>the</strong> second day of <strong>the</strong> Stanford<br />

incarceration, solidarity among <strong>the</strong> prisoners was broken. That<br />

was done via <strong>the</strong> psychological tactic of designating a “privileged<br />

cell” for “good prisoners,” whose inhabitants could exercise freedoms<br />

which were not given to <strong>the</strong> inmates of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r cells.<br />

Comparable residence in privileged rooms/houses, or increased<br />

access to <strong>the</strong> guru-figure, is often given in ashrams to disciples who<br />

are <strong>the</strong> most loyal in following <strong>the</strong> rules set down by <strong>the</strong>ir guru<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r superiors. Indeed, Milne (1986), Tarlo (1997) and van<br />

der Braak (2003) have all described exactly that dynamic, alleged<br />

to occur under Rajneesh and <strong>the</strong> pale, yuppie imitation of a guru,<br />

Andy Cohen. Comparable promotions and demotions have also<br />

been reported in Adi Da’s community. In SRF, by comparison, residence<br />

in <strong>the</strong> “power center” of Mount Washington is valued over<br />

“banishment” to <strong>the</strong>ir ancillary temples in Hollywood, Hidden Valley,<br />

or India.<br />

In attempting to break <strong>the</strong> will of <strong>the</strong>ir prisoners, Zimbardo’s<br />

guards resorted to <strong>the</strong> non-violent humiliation of <strong>the</strong>m.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!