24.12.2012 Views

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

302 STRIPPING THE GURUS<br />

Lady Wonder was equally feted by <strong>the</strong> New York World in<br />

1927, as allegedly being able to “read minds, predict <strong>the</strong> future and<br />

converse in Chinese.” Yet, that did not stop her from being conclusively<br />

debunked by Milbourne Christopher in 1956:<br />

As a test, Christopher gave Lady’s trainer, Mrs. Claudia<br />

Fonda, a false name, “John Banks”.... When Christopher subsequently<br />

inquired of Lady, “What is my name?,” <strong>the</strong> mare<br />

obligingly nudged <strong>the</strong> levers [of <strong>the</strong> horse’s large “typewriter”]<br />

to spell out B-A-N-K-S....<br />

Mrs. Fonda gave a “slight movement” of her training rod<br />

whenever Lady’s head was at <strong>the</strong> correct letter (Nickell,<br />

2002).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r experimentation by Christopher disclosed that Fonda<br />

had herself been deceptively utilizing <strong>the</strong> mentalists’ trick of “pencil<br />

reading”—in visually following <strong>the</strong> movements of <strong>the</strong> free end of<br />

a pencil, to discern what number had been written down by a questioner.<br />

She was <strong>the</strong>n cueing Lady Wonder with that information,<br />

thus allowing <strong>the</strong> horse to fake “telepathy” well enough to fool <strong>the</strong><br />

credulous parapsychologist J. B. Rhine.<br />

Earlier in <strong>the</strong> twentieth century, Clever Hans had fared no<br />

better when tested by Oskar Pfungst:<br />

Pfungst’s study revealed that <strong>the</strong> horse could give a correct<br />

answer only if <strong>the</strong> questioner knew it. When Pfungst shielded<br />

<strong>the</strong> eyes of <strong>the</strong> animal, <strong>the</strong> hoof remained still. It was reasonable<br />

to suppose at this point that [Hans’ owner] was cueing<br />

Hans subconsciously. Fur<strong>the</strong>r study ruled out signals by<br />

touch or sound. Pfungst now centered his observations on <strong>the</strong><br />

questioner. He discovered that Hans started stamping when<br />

<strong>the</strong> questioner leaned forward ever so slightly to see <strong>the</strong> hoof<br />

in action. Hans stopped when <strong>the</strong> man relaxed even a fraction....<br />

Then Pfungst played horse himself. He rapped with his<br />

right hand as friends posed queries. Twenty-three out of<br />

twenty-five questioners gave <strong>the</strong> starting and stopping cue<br />

without realizing it. Pfungst’s answers were as baffling to<br />

<strong>the</strong>m as <strong>the</strong> horse’s had been (Christopher, 1970).<br />

“Not so clever now, eh, Hans?” Nor such a Clever Paramahansa.<br />

For, while “thinking” dogs, pigs, goats and geese have all<br />

been exhibited over <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> past few centuries, ordinary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!