24.12.2012 Views

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

388 STRIPPING THE GURUS<br />

Guru-devotion involves both your thoughts and actions. The<br />

most important thing is to develop <strong>the</strong> total conviction that<br />

your Guru is a Buddha.... If you doubt your Guru’s competence<br />

and ability to guide you, your practices will be extremely<br />

unstable and you will be unable to make any concrete<br />

progress....<br />

If your Guru acts in a seemingly unenlightened manner<br />

and you feel it would be hypocritical to think him a Buddha,<br />

you should remember that your own opinions are unreliable<br />

and <strong>the</strong> apparent faults you see may only be a reflection of<br />

your own deluded state of mind. Also you should think that if<br />

your Guru acted in a completely perfect manner, he would be<br />

inaccessible and you would be unable to relate to him. It is<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore out of your Guru’s great compassion that he may<br />

show apparent flaws. This is part of his use of skillful means<br />

in order for him to be able to teach you. He is mirroring your<br />

own faults (Beru Kyhentze Rinpoche, in [Berzin, 1978]; italics<br />

added).<br />

Once a person has been identified [in India] as a saint, a holy<br />

man, nothing he does or does not do can change his title,<br />

unless he is caught in flagrante, and several times, engaged<br />

in disastrous things like sex or forbidden drink. But even in<br />

such a case, once his charisma is firmly established, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

a dialectic out of such dilemma: <strong>the</strong> emancipated person is<br />

not bound by social rules, and <strong>the</strong>re is enough scripture to<br />

support it (Bharati, 1976).<br />

All of that, of course, is simply manipulative, power-preserving<br />

nonsense, presented in <strong>the</strong> guise of spirituality. And it all, as we<br />

have seen, exists just as surely in <strong>the</strong> traditional, agrarian East as<br />

in <strong>the</strong> postmodern West, by its own admission.<br />

The indefensibly stupid notion that <strong>the</strong> “real difficulty of ‘<strong>the</strong><br />

strange case of Adi Da’ is that <strong>the</strong> guru principle is nei<strong>the</strong>r understood<br />

nor accepted by our culture” is clearly part of <strong>the</strong> same dangerous<br />

apologetic. For, it is again obvious that whenever “God” is<br />

involved, <strong>the</strong>re are no checks and balances: “God” can always do<br />

whatever he wants, regardless of <strong>the</strong> surrounding culture or tradition.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> face of such traditional instruction, points such as <strong>the</strong><br />

following, from <strong>the</strong> Dalai Lama no less, ring utterly hollow:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!