24.12.2012 Views

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

... TO A NUNNERY 289<br />

Swami Sivananda has said that every woman whom a man<br />

lures into his bed must in some lifetime become his lawful<br />

wife (Radha, 1992).<br />

The late Swami Sivananda of [Rishikesh], to my mind <strong>the</strong><br />

most grotesque product of <strong>the</strong> Hindu Renaissance, advised<br />

people to write <strong>the</strong>ir “spiritual diaries”; and in oral instructions,<br />

he told Indian and Western disciples to write down<br />

how often <strong>the</strong>y masturbated.... [O]r, as one male disciple told<br />

me, “make a list of number of times when you use hand for<br />

pleasure, and check it like double book keeping against<br />

number of times when you renounced use of hand” (Bharati,<br />

1976).<br />

And <strong>the</strong>y say accountants don’t know how to have fun!<br />

Elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> same book, Swami Bharati—<strong>the</strong> highly opinionated<br />

monk of <strong>the</strong> Ramakrishna Order whom we have met earlier<br />

in some of his kinder moments—categorized Sivananda as a<br />

“pseudo-mystic ... fat and smiling.” (Of <strong>the</strong> Maharishi, by contrast,<br />

Bharati stated: “I have no reason to doubt that he is a genuine<br />

mystic.... Were it not for <strong>the</strong> additional claims that Mahesh Yogi<br />

and his disciples make for <strong>the</strong>ir brand of mini-yoga [regarding<br />

‘world peace,’ etc.], <strong>the</strong>ir product would be just as good as any o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

yoga discipline well done.” So, you see, no one really knows what [if<br />

any] is valid and what isn’t, even though <strong>the</strong>y all pretend to know.)<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r venting his own instructive anger and anguish solely<br />

for <strong>the</strong> compassionate benefit of o<strong>the</strong>rs, Bharati (1976) offered a<br />

comparable opinion of Vivekananda:<br />

The “four kinds of yoga” notion goes back, entirely, and without<br />

any mitigating circumstances, to Swami Vivekananda’s<br />

four dangerous little booklets entitled Raja-yoga, Karmayoga,<br />

Jnana-yoga, and Bhakti-yoga. [Those titles and terms<br />

refer to “royal,” “service,” “wisdom” and “devotional” yoga,<br />

respectively.] These are incredibly naïve, incredibly short excerpts<br />

from Indian literature in translations, rehashed in his<br />

talks in America and elsewhere....<br />

I am certain that Vivekananda has done more harm<br />

than good to <strong>the</strong> seekers of mystical knowledge.... Vivekananda’s<br />

concept of raja yoga ... is dysfunctional.<br />

Bharati’s own contributions to <strong>the</strong> understanding of mysticism,<br />

however, <strong>the</strong>mselves tended toward <strong>the</strong> insignificant side.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!