24.12.2012 Views

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

278 STRIPPING THE GURUS<br />

The clairvoyant ... can describe, for every mode of thought<br />

and for every law of nature, a form which expresses <strong>the</strong>m. A<br />

revengeful thought, for example, assumes an arrow-like,<br />

pronged form, while a kindly thought is often formed like an<br />

opening flower, and so on. Clear-cut, significant thoughts are<br />

regular and symmetrical in form, while confused thoughts<br />

have wavy outlines.<br />

And speaking of “wavy outlines”:<br />

Anthroposophical medicine seems to be based partly on<br />

magical <strong>the</strong>ories of correspondence—for example cholera is a<br />

punishment for insufficient self-confidence and <strong>the</strong> pox for<br />

lack of affection. Today <strong>the</strong> Anthroposophists run clinics, a<br />

mental hospital, and a factory for medicines which has marketed<br />

a cancer cure (Webb, 1976).<br />

As to Steiner’s overall caliber of thought, <strong>the</strong>n, Storr (1996)<br />

summarizes:<br />

His belief system is so eccentric, so unsupported by evidence,<br />

so manifestly bizarre, that rational skeptics are bound to<br />

consider it delusional....<br />

[H]is so-called thinking, his supposed power of supersensible<br />

perception, led to a vision of <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>the</strong> universe,<br />

and of cosmic history which is entirely unsupported by any<br />

evidence, which is at odds with practically everything which<br />

modern physics and astronomy have revealed, and which is<br />

more like science fiction than anything else.<br />

In a somewhat gentler vein, Robert Carroll (2004d) concluded:<br />

There is no question that Steiner made contributions in<br />

many fields, but as a philosopher, scientist, and artist he<br />

rarely rises above mediocrity and is singularly unoriginal.<br />

The anti-Darwinian Ken Wilber (2000b), however, expressed<br />

his own, more positive evaluation of poor Rudolf, in this way:<br />

[Steiner] was an extraordinary pioneer ... and one of <strong>the</strong><br />

most comprehensive psychological and philosophical visionaries<br />

of his time.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!