24.12.2012 Views

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX 527<br />

es <strong>the</strong> activity of a new kind of implicate order [i.e., <strong>the</strong><br />

super-implicate order].<br />

That perspective <strong>the</strong>n incorporates both <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong> implicate<br />

order being a “movement of outgoing and incoming waves,”<br />

and Bohm’s original “causal” (or “hidden variable”) interpretation<br />

of quantum <strong>the</strong>ory. (The latter formulation was published in 1952,<br />

and already contained <strong>the</strong> quantum potential term.)<br />

The quantum potential appears when one is solving Schrödinger’s<br />

equation in deriving <strong>the</strong> “WKB approximation” of quantum<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory, for example (see Chapter 3 of Bohm and Hiley [1993]).<br />

That (ma<strong>the</strong>matical) term is present immediately alongside <strong>the</strong><br />

electromagnetic potential acting on <strong>the</strong> same system. And indeed,<br />

<strong>the</strong> quantum potential, with an effect that does not drop off with<br />

increasing distance, exerts a physical force on <strong>the</strong> matter in its vicinity,<br />

just as does <strong>the</strong> electromagnetic potential. In nei<strong>the</strong>r case<br />

does matter “arise” from such potentials, nor did <strong>the</strong> “original<br />

meaning” of <strong>the</strong> quantum potential ever suggest that it might, in<br />

spite of Wilber’s (1982) misunderstandings to <strong>the</strong> contrary:<br />

[M]atter [possibly] arises from a physical energy-sea. This<br />

seems to me <strong>the</strong> original meaning of Bohm’s ... quantum potential.<br />

The aforementioned super-implicate order, again, is a field<br />

which determines <strong>the</strong> behavior of <strong>the</strong> particles of <strong>the</strong> (first) implicate<br />

and <strong>the</strong> explicate orders. Although it is “<strong>the</strong> source from which<br />

<strong>the</strong> forms of <strong>the</strong> first implicate order are generated” (Bohm and<br />

Peat, 1987), it is not simply “ano<strong>the</strong>r level of enfolding/unfolding<br />

particles,” akin to ano<strong>the</strong>r link in <strong>the</strong> perennial philosophy’s Great<br />

Chain of Being. (This will become highly relevant later on, regarding<br />

Wilber’s use of his own misunderstandings in that regard to<br />

find additional fault with Bohm’s work.)<br />

The super-implicate order makes <strong>the</strong> implicate order nonlinear<br />

and organizes it into relatively stable forms with complex<br />

structures (Bohm, in [Weber, 1986]).<br />

The essential flow [of explicated matter through time] is not<br />

from one place to ano<strong>the</strong>r but a movement within <strong>the</strong> implicate<br />

and super-implicate ... orders. At every moment, <strong>the</strong> totality<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se orders is present and enfolded throughout all<br />

space so ... <strong>the</strong>y all interpenetrate (Bohm and Peat, 1987).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!