24.12.2012 Views

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

stripping the gurus - Brahma Kumaris Info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NORMAN EINSTEIN 219<br />

cient for him that his scientific mystics test <strong>the</strong>ir internal experiences<br />

against nothing more than each o<strong>the</strong>r’s internal experiences.<br />

How this would eliminate group bias or error is not discussed.” I<br />

have yet to find that obvious and devastating point addressed by<br />

Wilber himself anywhere in his own writings, before or since that<br />

review.<br />

For, consider Aurobindo’s or Maharshi’s internal visionary experiences.<br />

As we have seen, both of those mystics were communityverified<br />

as being “au<strong>the</strong>ntic” and, indeed, as being among <strong>the</strong> very<br />

best in <strong>the</strong> world. (They are Wilber’s “favorites” for a reason, after<br />

all.) And yet, in <strong>the</strong> most reasonable and generous interpretation,<br />

and in my own opinion, nei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong>m could distinguish between<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own fantasies and “real” spiritual experiences. Had <strong>the</strong>y, and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs like <strong>the</strong>m, been from <strong>the</strong> same spiritual tradition, those fantasies<br />

would surely have largely conformed to what <strong>the</strong>y had been<br />

commonly taught <strong>the</strong>y should experience in meditation. That,<br />

however, would make <strong>the</strong>m no more real, even though being verified<br />

by each o<strong>the</strong>r and by <strong>the</strong> entire community.<br />

Interestingly, comparably flawed arguments as Wilber’s, in<br />

favor of <strong>the</strong> “scientific” nature of meditation-based religion, were<br />

put forth by Itzhak Bentov in <strong>the</strong> 1970s:<br />

I am lucky to have met several people whose [meditative]<br />

experiences have been similar to mine, so that I have been<br />

able to compare my information with <strong>the</strong>irs. To my great<br />

surprise, our experiences agreed not only in general, but also<br />

in many unexpected details. This knowledge appears, <strong>the</strong>refore,<br />

to be consistent and reproducible.<br />

(Wilber [1982] quotes from o<strong>the</strong>r published aspects of Bentov’s<br />

work. It is <strong>the</strong>refore likely that he was aware of <strong>the</strong> earlier [1977]<br />

book from which <strong>the</strong> above quote is drawn. Or, if he wasn’t, as <strong>the</strong><br />

“foremost <strong>the</strong>oretician in transpersonal psychology” he certainly<br />

should have been.)<br />

Yet, Richard Feynman (1989) more reasonably noted:<br />

[T]he imagination that things are real does not represent<br />

true reality. If you see golden globes, or something, several<br />

times, and <strong>the</strong>y talk to you during your hallucination and<br />

tell you <strong>the</strong>y are ano<strong>the</strong>r intelligence, it doesn’t mean <strong>the</strong>y’re<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r intelligence; it just means that you have had this<br />

particular hallucination.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!