24.05.2023 Views

The art and architecture of India - Buddhist, Hindu, Jain (Art Ebook)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

.

124 ROMANO-INDIAN ART

Although coins arc generally regarded as

minor art, for periods like that of the Kushan

Scythians they furnish evidence invaluable for

the interpretation of the major arts. They provide

us with the complete evidence ofthe strangely

syncretic character of Kushan art and religion

Just as postage stamps to-day furnish the philatelist

with symbolical commentaries on the

economic and cultural environment of the countries

of issue, the Kushan coins provide an

advertisement of the religious and cultural relationships

of this dynasty. Kujula Kadphises

imitates the coins of Augustus [65 g]; deified

Rome has her place on the money of Huvishka

[65 k]. Judging from the array of deities to be

found on the coins of Kanishka and his successors,

the pantheon of the Kushans included not

only the Buddha [65 h], but, in addition to

Siva [65 j], representatives of the divinities of

Iran and Greece [65 E, f, i, and l], all identified

by inscriptions in corrupt Greek letters.

Under the Kushan emperors Gandhara enjoyed

its period of greatest prosperity, and it is

to this era that the finest Gandhara sculpture is

to be assigned. The dates of Kanishka's reign

have been the subject of considerable dispute

among scholars. Although the years a.d. 1 28 and

144 4 have been suggested for the beginning of

his reign, recent evidence favours a date from

78 to no as the year of his accession. Such a

date conforms very well with the development

of the Buddhist art of Gandhara, for which he

may well have been largely responsible. The

dynasty of Kanishka lasted about a hundred and

fifty years, since in a.d. 241 an invasion by

Shapur I of Iran brought to an end the rule of

the last sovereign of Kanishka's line, Vasudeva. 5

In c. 390 a lesser Kushan dynasty established

itself in north-western India until the fifth century

a.d. For the later history of Gandhara we

are dependent almost entirely on the accounts of

Chinese pilgrims who, as early as the fifth century,

undertook the long journey to the holy

land of Buddhism. Fa Hsien, who travelled

through the Peshawar Valley shortly after a.d.

400, describes the foundations of Kanishka and

his successors as flourishing and well cared for.

When his successor, Sung Yiin, visited the

region in 520, the country had already been overrun

by Mihiragula and the White Huns. It was

indeed only a few years after Sung Yiin's visit

that this ferocious barbarian virtually extirpated

Buddhism in Gandhara by his destruction

of the monasteries and butchery of the population.

When the last of the Chinese pilgrims,

Hsiian-tsang, came to north-west India a century

later, he found the country in a ruinous,

depopulated state, with most of the Buddhist

establishments in a state of complete decay.

Although all Buddhist art in Gandhara proper

came to an end with the invasion of the Huns,

the style survived in Kashmir and in isolated

Buddhist establishments in Afghanistan as late

as the seventh or eighth century a.d.

Although the period of its florescence follows

after the early Indian schools of the Maurya,

Sunga, and Andhra Dynasties, the art of Gandhara

is not in any way a continuation of this

indigenous tradition. Its geographical position

and the contacts between the Kushan rulers and

the West made for the development of a style

quite apart from the main stream of Indian tradition,

and in certain aspects almost entirely

Western in form. The subject-matter is, however,

Indian. The repertory of motifs already

known to the early Indian schools and the technique

of archaic Indian sculpture are to a limited

extent carried on in this outlying province of

Indian culture. There never was any real fusion

of Indian and Western ideals in Gandhara. The

arts of India and Gandhara advanced along

separate paths in different directions. Inevitably,

the inappropriateness of the humanistic

Classic forms of Western art for the expression

of the mystical and symbolic beliefs of Indian

Buddhism led to the disappearance of this

imported style with the development of the

truly Indian ideals of the Gupta Period.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!