24.05.2023 Views

The art and architecture of India - Buddhist, Hindu, Jain (Art Ebook)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ROMANO-INDIAN

134

'

ART

figures emerging from the depths of the shadowed

background are obviously carved in such

a way as to provide a very rich and dramatic

contrast in light and shade. The relief is a perfect

illustration of the strangely unhappy stylistic

mixture resulting from the combination of the

technically advanced and realistic methods of

Roman craftsmanship and the essentially archaic

and conceptual point of view of the native Indian

tradition. The whole is a strange combination

of the illusionistic depth and dramatized

chiaroscuro of Roman relief combined with the

old intuitive method of indicating spatial perspective

by placing the consecutive rows of figures

one above the other that we have already

seen at Sanchi and elsewhere. Another distinctly

non-Indian feature is the violent expression of

emotion, not only the gestures, but the facial

contortions of many of the figures emphasizing

their grief at the Lord's demise. This concern

with the expression of pathos and inner feeling,

suggestive of the so-called barbarian sarcophagi

of third-century Roman art, comes to be exploited

to an even greater extent in the final or

'Gothic' phase of sculpture in Gandhara. A final

illustration of the irreconcilable mixture of Classical

humanism and the iconographical demands

of Buddhism may be discerned in the figure of

the dying Buddha himself. According to the

ancient principle of hieratic scaling, the figure

is enormously larger than the forms of the

mourning disciples. This dualism becomes the

more apparent when we realize that the form is

not really conceived of as a reclining body at all,

but, like Western medieval tomb effigies, is

simply a standing Buddha type placed on its

side. This panel is probably to be dated in the

heyday of foreign workmanship in Gandhara,

in the late second or early third century a.d. 20

We are probably safe in concluding that,

whereas in the early centuries of Gandhara

sculpture the favourite medium for carving was

the blue schist and green phyllite of the region,

stucco or lime-plaster was employed for sculpture

as early as the first century a.d., and by the

third century a.d. had largely replaced stone as

the material for the decoration of stupas and

viharas. The malleable nature of this medium

made for a freedom of expression that eluded

the carvers of the intractable slate. Both stone

and stucco images were originally embellished

with polychromy and gold leaf. The use ofstucco

for architectural decoration had its origin in

Iran, and it may well be that the Sasanian

invasion of a.d. 241 was responsible for the late,

almost universal employment of stucco in all

Gandhara. Although the

famous Afghan site

of Hadda has become world-renowned as a

centre of late Gandhara sculpture, it should not

be overlooked that there are many fine specimens

in stucco from such north-west Indian sites as

Taxila, Sahri-Bahlol, and Takht-i-Bahi near

Peshawar. In the last centuries of the Gandhara

school it is difficult to make any distinction in

either style or technique between the sculptures

of the Kabul Valley, the Peshawar region, and

the religious establishments of Taxila in the

Punjab.

The sculpture of Gandhara seems to confirm

the testimony ofthe Chinese pilgrims on the pre-

.dominance of the Hinayana sect of Buddhism. 21

The subject-matter of the single statues is for

the most part restricted to representations of

the mortal Sakyamuni and the Buddha of the

Future, Maitreya. The reliefs, with the exception

of Bacchanalian scenes and other subjects

of Hellenistic origin, are devoted entirely to

illustrations of the life of Buddha and the

legends of his earlier incarnations. A number of

statues identifiable as the Bodhisattva Avalokitesvara

and reliefs with multiple Buddha

images may be taken as the earliest examples of

Mahayana Buddhist sculpture.

Undoubtedly there was at one time a great

corpus of Gandhara sculpture in metal, of which

only a few small statuettes survive. There are,

however, even more interesting survivals in

this medium : from the early decades of the nine-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!