24.05.2023 Views

The art and architecture of India - Buddhist, Hindu, Jain (Art Ebook)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE PERIOD OF THE HINDU DYNASTIES 301

Draupadi's rath. It consists of a one-storey

square cell surmounted by an overhanging,

curvilinear roof, suggestive in its shape of the

modern Bengali huts. There is every reason to

believe that this, like so many forms of structural

Indian architecture, is an imitation of a prototype

constructed of bamboo and thatch. The

resemblance to the sikhara suggests that this

most characteristically Dravidian element may

also have had its origin in the form of a bamboo

hut or temple car.

In the consideration of the art of the Hindu

Renaissance it is impossible to treat of sculpture

apart from architecture, since to an even greater

degree than in the earlier periods the carving

literally melts into the architectural enframement

that supports it. The plastic adornment of

the raths consists of images of Hindu deities set

in niches on the exterior of the shrine, and also

of panels illustrating legends of Hindu mythology

ornamenting the interior of the sanctuaries.

The figures appear to be a development

from the style of the Later Andhra Period,

rather than from the Gupta school. They retain

the extremely graceful attenuation of the forms

at Amaravati, and are animated by the same

feeling for movement and emotionally expressive

poses and gestures. A new canon of proportion

is notable in the heart-shaped faces 22 with

their high cheekbones and the almost tubular

exaggeration of the thinness of the arms and

legs. In the reliefs decorating the raths the forms

are not so completely disengaged from the

background as in the Andhra Period, but seem

to be emerging from the matrix of the stone.

The greatest achievement of the Pallava

sculptors was the carving of an enormous granite

boulder on the seashore with a representation

ofthe Descent ofthe Ganges from the Himalayas

[234]. To give the reader an idea of the scale of

this gigantic undertaking, it may be pointed out

that the scores of figures of men and animals,

including those of the family of elephants, are

represented in life size. The subject of the relief

is that of all creatures great and small, the devas

in the skies, the holy men on the banks of the

life-giving flood, the nagas m its waves, and the

members of the animal kingdom, one and all

giving thanks to Siva for his miraculous gift to

the Indian world. The cleft in the centre of the

giant boulder was at one time an actual channel

for water, simulating the Descent of the Ganges

from a basin at the top of a rock. We have here

a perfect illustration of that dualism persistent

in Indian art between an intensive naturalism

and the conception of divine forms according

to the principles of an appropriately abstract

canon of proportions. We have, in other words,

the same distinction between the divine and

the earthly as is noticeable in El Greco's 'Burial

of the Count of Orgaz', in which the figures in

the celestial zone are drawn according to the

Byzantine canon of attenuated forms for supernatural

beings, whereas the personages in the

lower, earthly section of the panel are painted in

a realistic manner. In the relief at Mamallapuram

the shapes of the devas, moving like

clouds across the top of the composition, have

the svelte, disembodied elegance of the art of

Amaravati. By contrast, no more perfect realizations

of living animal types are to be found anywhere

in the sculpture of the Eastern world.

This vast, densely populated composition, like

the Chalukya paintings of the Ajanta caves, is

no longer confined by any frame or artificial

boundary, but flows unrestrained over the entire

available surface of the boulder from which it is

carved [235]. Just as the space of the relief as a

whole is untramelled and, indeed, seems to flow

into the space occupied by the spectator, so the

individual forms in it are only partially disengaged

from the stone which imprisons them.

One has the impression, indeed, that they are in

continual process of emerging from the substance

of the rock itself. There is the same

suggestion of the birth of all form from Maya

that was so apparent in the Sunga reliefs at

Bhaja. As the late Dr Zimmer expressed it:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!