17.01.2013 Views

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120 3. Preferences and decision making<br />

in the usual sense that no other feasible choice would have been preferred<br />

by all household members. This approach was originally suggested by <strong>Chiappori</strong><br />

(1988, 1992) and Apps and Rees (1988). Following <strong>Chiappori</strong>, we<br />

refer to such models as collective and refer to households that always have<br />

Pareto efficient outcomes as collective households. More specific representations,<br />

based on bargaining theory, are briefly discussed at the end at this<br />

section. In the remainder of this chapter we briefly introduce the collective<br />

model. Chapters 4 and 5 expand on this discussion.<br />

The collective approach relies on two fundamental assumptions. First,<br />

there exists a decision process in the household and it is stable. Second,<br />

this process leads to Pareto efficient outcomes. We discuss these aspects<br />

successively.<br />

3.5.1 Decision processes<br />

A fundamental assumption in unitary demand theory is that individual<br />

preferences are stable, in the sense of not changing capriciously from moment<br />

to moment. This is not a logical requirement; in principle, the world<br />

could be such that people are intrinsically inconsistent, and a person’s preferences<br />

today are unconnected with those of yesterday. Clearly, in such a<br />

world, very little could be say about individual behavior: a minimum level<br />

of stability is necessary if we wish to make predictions based on our models.<br />

Thesamerequirementappliestoany model aimed at describing the<br />

behavior of a group. The notion of stability, in that case, must be given a<br />

broader interpretation: it relates not only to preferences, but also to the<br />

decision process. Again, the world could be such that a given household,<br />

faced with the same environment in different time periods, adopts each time<br />

adifferent decision process leading to different outcomes. And again, in such<br />

a world not much could be predicted about household behavior. We rule<br />

out these situations by assuming the existence of a stable decision process.<br />

Formally, we define the fundamentals of the model as the preferences of the<br />

members and the domestic technologies they can use. A decision process<br />

is a mapping that associates, to given fundamentals and given vectors of<br />

prices, incomes and factors that affect preferences and the decision process,<br />

a probability distribution over the set of consumption bundles. Our first<br />

basic assumption is thus the following:<br />

Axiom 3.1 (Stability) Each household is characterized by a unique decision<br />

process.<br />

In words: there is a stable relationship between the fundamentals of the<br />

model, the economic environment and the chosen outcomes. Note that, in<br />

full generality, this relationship needs not be deterministic. It may be the<br />

case, for instance, that in some circumstances the process will lead to ex-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!