17.01.2013 Views

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

y:<br />

6. Uncertainty and Dynamics in the Collective model 247<br />

W a = u a + δ a u b<br />

= u (x)+δ a u (1 − x) (6.2)<br />

W b = δ b u a + u b<br />

= δ b u (x)+u (1 − x) (6.3)<br />

where δ s ≥ 0 is person s’s caring for the other person, with δ a δ b < 1 (see<br />

chapter 3). We assume that the caring parameters are constant and outside<br />

the control of either partner. Rather than choosing an explicit game form<br />

to choose x, we simply assume that there is some (collective) procedure<br />

that leads the household to behave as though it maximizes the function:<br />

W = W a + μW b<br />

³<br />

= 1+μδ b´<br />

u (x)+(δ a + μ) u (1 − x) (6.4)<br />

As discussed in chapter 4, caringmodifies the Pareto weight for b to an<br />

effective value of (δ a ³<br />

+ μ) / 1+μδ b´<br />

.<br />

Now suppose there is a (moving) decision that costlessly increases household<br />

income from unity to y>1. Ifthisistheonlyeffect then, of course,<br />

both partners would agree to move. However, we also assume that the decision<br />

increases b’s Pareto weight to μ (1 + m) where m ≥ 0. Inthiscase<br />

there is a reservation income y ∗ (m) such that person a will veto the move<br />

if and only if y

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!