17.01.2013 Views

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

356 8. Sharing the gains from marriage<br />

single. Because men are always locally scarce, r<br />

Z > 1, it follows from (8.40)<br />

that their utility must grow along the stable assignment at a faster rate<br />

than the utility of their assigned wives. It is readily seen that the husband’s<br />

share is higher in matches with sufficiently high income. In particular, the<br />

best match with x =1and y = Z, yields an output of (1+Z)2<br />

4 ,ofwhich<br />

the husband receives 1 Z Z<br />

Z2 Z<br />

4 + 2 − 4r and the wife receives 4 + 4r , which is a<br />

smaller share.<br />

If there are more men than women, r 1, men<br />

are always locally scarce, and it follows from (8.40) that the husband will<br />

have a higher share in the output of all marriages. If, however, r<br />

Z<br />

< 1 and<br />

women are always locally scarce, then the utility of women grows along the<br />

stable assignment profile at a faster rate than the utility of their assigned<br />

husbands, and they may eventually overtake them. Indeed, the wife’s share<br />

in the best match is Z<br />

Z2 rZ<br />

2 + 4 − 4<br />

and the husband’s share is 1<br />

4<br />

+ rZ<br />

4<br />

, which<br />

is smaller if r is sufficiently small.<br />

This example illustrates clearly the impact of changes in the sex ratio<br />

r and the distribution of female income as indexed by Z, onthewelfare<br />

of women and men. Recall that marginal increases in x0 or y0 have no<br />

effect on u(x) or v (y) , respectively. Inspection of the integrands in (8.40),<br />

shows that u(x) must increase in r and Z, while v (y) must decrease in r<br />

and Z. As we noted above, the result that women are worse off when the<br />

mean income of women rises sounds surprising. However, the reason that a<br />

woman who maintains her income is worse off when Z risesisthatthereare<br />

more women with income above her, which means that she cannot ”afford”<br />

anymore a husband with the same income as before. However, any woman<br />

who keeps her position in the income distribution, (that is, whose income<br />

rose at the same proportion as Z) will obtain a husband with the same<br />

x as before the change. Then it can be shown that if r>1, her surplus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!