17.01.2013 Views

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24 1. Facts<br />

1.4 Children<br />

Children are the most important ‘products’ of the family. The decision<br />

about how many children to have, when to have them and how to care for<br />

them interacts importantly with a whole host of other decisions including<br />

schooling, marriage, divorce and re-marriage.<br />

1.4.1 Fertility<br />

As we saw, for marriage and divorce there is considerable heterogeneity<br />

across countries and time and this is even more true for fertility. Figure<br />

1.30 presents the time path for completed fertility for cohorts of US women<br />

born between 1903 and 1956. 7 The most important feature of this figure is<br />

that there are significant variations across cohorts in the mean number of<br />

children per woman. Thus, women born early in the century had about 2.2<br />

children, those born in the mid-1930’s (the mothers of the ‘baby-boom’)<br />

hadoverthreechildrenandthoseborninthefifties had close to two. Table<br />

1.15 shows the change in the distribution of children born for women born<br />

in the mid-1930’s and in the late 1950’s. As can be seen the change in the<br />

mean is partly a result of fewer women born in the 1930’s being childless<br />

and partly a result of these women having larger families, conditional on<br />

having a child at all. Particularly striking is that the modal family size<br />

for the older cohort is 4+ but only 2 for the younger cohort. Figure 1.31<br />

shows data on the number of children less than 18 of US women (married<br />

or single), aged 35−45, atdifferent periods of time. 8 As seen, the reduction<br />

in fertility and marriage rates during the second half of the 20’th century<br />

is associated with a decrease in the proportion of women with more than 3<br />

children and an increase in the proportion of women with no children, while<br />

the proportion of women with 1 or 2 children remained unchanged at about<br />

half. By 2000-2005, the proportion of women with children is still high (67<br />

percent) indicating that the natural desire to have children remains strong.<br />

Figure 1.32 shows that the birth rate fluctuates dramatically over time.<br />

We see a large increase from the mid-1930’s to the early 1960’s and then<br />

7 Completed fertility is defined as the mean number of children born to women of<br />

a given generation at the end of their childbearing years. This is calculated by adding<br />

the fertility rates by age of the mother observed for successive years, when the cohort<br />

has reached the age in question (in general, only ages between 15 and 49 years are<br />

considered). In practice, the fertility rates for older women can be estimated using the<br />

rates observed for previous generations, without waiting for the cohort to reach the end<br />

ofthereproductiveperiod.<br />

8 Table 1.15 and Figure 20 provide different but complementary information. The table<br />

shows completed fertility whereas the figure shows the number of children less than 18<br />

living with the mother. Therefore, the proportion of women who have no children living<br />

with them in the figure is larger than the proportion of women who never had children<br />

in the table.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!