17.01.2013 Views

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

380 8. Sharing the gains from marriage<br />

In principle, it is possible to calculate these coefficients directly by solving<br />

the market equilibrium (that is the linear programming problem) associated<br />

with a stable assignment. More interestingly, one can use data on<br />

actual marriage patterns and the observed attributes of participants in a<br />

"marriage market" to estimate the gains from marriage of these individuals<br />

(relative to remaining single). 14 Basically, the preferences for different<br />

types of spouses are "revealed" from the choice probabilities of individuals.<br />

Taking the simplest case without covariates, we see<br />

Pr (i ∈ I is matched with j ∈ J)<br />

ln<br />

Pr (i ∈ I is single)<br />

Pr (j ∈ J is matched with i ∈ I)<br />

ln<br />

Pr (j ∈ J is single)<br />

= UIJ − UI0<br />

= UIJ − UJ0. (8.59)<br />

Estimating separate multinomial logit for men and women, one can estimate<br />

the utilities for each gender in a marriage of each type. Summing the<br />

estimated utilities one can recover, for each matching of types (I,J), the<br />

systematic output of the marriage ξ IJ (which, under the normalization that<br />

being single yields zero utility, equals the total surplus ZIJ). The estimated<br />

matrix ZIJ can then be analyzed in terms of the assortative matching that<br />

it implies. Of particular interest is whether or not this matrix is supermodular<br />

(implying positive assortative mating) or not. As noted by Choo<br />

and Siow (2006) and Siow (2009), in the absence of covariates the super<br />

modularity of ZIJ is equivalent to the supermodularity of<br />

ln (μ(I,J))2<br />

σ(I)σ(J)<br />

where μ(I,J) is the total number of type (I,J) marriages and σ(I) and<br />

σ(J) are the number of single men and single women, respectively. Such<br />

supermodularity requires that for all I 0 >I and J 0 >J<br />

ln μ(I0 ,J0 )μ(I,J)<br />

μ(I,J0 )μ(I0 > 0.<br />

,J)<br />

Siow (2009) uses census data on married couples in the US, where the<br />

husband and wife are 32-36 and 31-35 respectively. In each couple, the wife<br />

and the husband can belong to one of five possible schooling classes (less<br />

than high school, high school, some college, college and college plus). He<br />

compares the marriage patterns in the years 1970 and 2000 and finds that<br />

in each of the two years strict supermodularity fails to hold as in some<br />

of the off diagonal cells, the log odds ratio is negative. Looking at the<br />

14 Because the probabilities in (8.58) are unaffected by a common proportionality factor,<br />

some normalization is required. A common practice is to set the utility from being<br />

single to zero for all individuals.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!