17.01.2013 Views

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

Pierre André Chiappori (Columbia) "Family Economics" - Cemmap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

362 8. Sharing the gains from marriage<br />

costs of) out-of-wedlock children, due to the fact that they do not live in<br />

the same household. On the other hand, married men’s utility is of the form<br />

UH(cH,k)=cH +uHk, where the parameter uH > 0 is identical for all men<br />

in the economy. Women differ in their preferences toward children. Specifically,<br />

female utility functions take the quasi-linear form U(c, k) =c + uk.<br />

Here, each woman is characterized by the individual-specific tasteparameter<br />

u, which is distributed according to the density f over the interval<br />

[0,U]. We assume that any woman (single or married) who wants a child<br />

can have one. However, if she plans to have no children, unwanted births<br />

may still occur with some probability p, which depends on the available<br />

contraceptive technology and the legality of abortion.<br />

The quasilinear structure of the male and female preferences implies that<br />

utility is transferable within marriage. For each spouse, the utility depends<br />

on the couple’s fertility decision and on the share of composite good that<br />

he or she receives.<br />

As before, we normalize the mass of men to be 1, and we denote by r<br />

the total mass of women on the market; here, we assume that r>1, that<br />

is that women are on the long side of the market. Male income is denoted<br />

by Y . Women without children have income, y; however, if a woman has<br />

children, her income drops to y 0 ,withy 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!