13.02.2013 Views

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NUTTING ET AL.<br />

TABLE 4. Results From Three Service Units of the Indicator Sequence<br />

Designed to Examine the Continuity of Process for Treatment and Follow-Up<br />

1. Contact for The proportiotn of patients with<br />

evaluation a positive screening result who<br />

made contact with the health<br />

cate system within an<br />

appropriate time frame<br />

(within 3 weeks for anemia and<br />

within 2 weeks for urinary<br />

tract infection).<br />

2. Recognition of The proportion of patients making<br />

problem contact for whom there was any<br />

evidence that the problem<br />

was recognized.<br />

3. Provision of The proportion of patients with<br />

treatment the problem recognized who<br />

received appropriate treatment<br />

within 2 weeks afer<br />

recognition.<br />

4. Contact for The proportion of patients<br />

follow-up achieving contact with the health<br />

care system within a<br />

time frame appropriate<br />

for follow-up (within 3-6 weeks<br />

afier treatment initiated for<br />

anemia and %w ! in 4 weeks aftcr<br />

~t..i;.~.q.~; :."i.s;Ne or-omp}eretefor<br />

unnary dtra'cC iiiLi.~c2i/,.<br />

5. Recognition of The proportion of patients making<br />

need for contact for whom there is any *<br />

follow-up evidence that the problem<br />

andlor the need for follow-up<br />

was recognized.<br />

6. Provision of The proportion of patients with<br />

follow-up recognition of problem<br />

and/or the need for follow-up,<br />

who received an appropriate<br />

follow.up (hemotocrit, hemoglobin,<br />

or reticulocyte count for anemia;<br />

urine culture or microscopic<br />

urinalysis for urinary<br />

tract infection).<br />

Continuity-of- The proportion of patients with<br />

process index a positive screening result who<br />

completed the entire health<br />

care sequence. (The continuityof-process<br />

index may also be<br />

computed as the product of the<br />

proportions for each of the<br />

indicators 1 through 6).<br />

Service Service Service<br />

Unit C Unit D Unit E<br />

0.92 (62/67) 0.93 (931100) 0.73 (73/100)<br />

0.90 (56;62) 0.76(71,93) 0.62 (45173)<br />

0.95 (53/56) 0.,99 (70/7, ) 0,93 (42/45)<br />

0.83 (441/53) 0.89 (62/70) 0.52 (22/42)<br />

0.69 (39'44) 0.61 ,i,. .6',<br />

'.<br />

0.95 (37/39) 0.95(36/38) 1.0 (9;9)<br />

0.55 (37/67) 0.36 (36/100) 0.09 (9/100)<br />

The results shown are an aggregate ofdata derived from nutritional anemia and urinarytractinfections.The study<br />

cohorts for Service Units D and E are random samples of 50 patients foreach tracer. The study cohorts from Senive<br />

Unit C consist of a total sample of 36 patients with anemia and 31 patients with urinarv tract infection.<br />

health nurses performn well in recognition,<br />

but the hospital outpatient department and<br />

the field clinics contribute substantially<br />

less to the perfornnance.<br />

- 132 - .MEDICAL CARE<br />

The data in Table 6 show that the<br />

average-risk women who were due for ca;re<br />

made a higher proportion of their encouln<br />

ters with the prenatal clinic than did the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!