13.02.2013 Views

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 197 -<br />

analysis, forecasting, and negotiation<br />

activities in the programming and budgeting<br />

phases. For the nonfinancial objectives,<br />

explicit statements of expectations<br />

should be available from the planning<br />

phase.<br />

Information about actual outcomes<br />

should be available from the organization's<br />

management information system.<br />

The data should be accurate, provided<br />

on a timely basis, and must be comparable<br />

with data from the budgeting<br />

system. This generally means that the<br />

hospital's financial accounting system<br />

must have the ability to 1) accumulate<br />

expense items by responsibility center,<br />

2) provide cost accounting systems for<br />

calculating per-únit costs, and 3) collect<br />

operating statistics as an integral<br />

part of the systematic management information<br />

system. Davis and Freeman<br />

(641 offer some suggestions on how to<br />

evaluate management information systems,<br />

and DATAPRO [651 specifies<br />

some guidelines for judging commercial<br />

software packages.<br />

The assessment of performance<br />

should be as timely as data permits.<br />

The first cut at the analysis should be<br />

standardized management reports of<br />

four types:<br />

1. Productivity Monitoring. Reports in<br />

which the productivity (output +<br />

input) of responsibility centers and/<br />

or individual providers is measured.<br />

These reports compare actual measures<br />

with internal and/or external<br />

standards [17, Chap. 18; 66-681.<br />

2. Variance Analysis. Methodologies<br />

for estimating the difference between<br />

budgeted and actual accounts.<br />

Such analyses can be performed at<br />

the total or gross variance level for<br />

specific responsibility center or line<br />

items [691 or at the component variance<br />

levels [9, pp. 82-85; 701. Component<br />

variance analysis attempts to<br />

partition the total experience into<br />

Health Services Research<br />

parts which correspond to identifiable<br />

causes, e.g., price, volume, supply<br />

quantity, etc.<br />

3. Operational Audit. Process of examining<br />

the operations of departments<br />

and organizational control systems<br />

to assess their effectiveness. The<br />

process is concerned with problem<br />

detection rather than problem solving<br />

[711.<br />

4. Financial Statement Analysis.<br />

Methodologies for analyzing the organization's<br />

financial performance<br />

as a whole and assessing its financial<br />

position 172,73].<br />

The purpose óf this first cut analysis is<br />

to systematically identify problems<br />

and, to the extent possible, their apparent<br />

causes. When problems are indicated,<br />

further analysis and discussions<br />

with responsibility managers are generally<br />

necessary to identify the true<br />

causes and the appropriate courses of<br />

action.<br />

The reporting and analysis of performance<br />

serve several purposes. First, the<br />

reports are used to keep management<br />

informed of what is happening in the<br />

different responsibility centers. Management<br />

can, when necessary, take appropriate<br />

action on the basis of these<br />

reports, or can initiate additional analyses.<br />

Second, they can be used to evaluate<br />

the performance of responsibility<br />

center heads. Third, such reports may<br />

indicate that the budgeting process<br />

should be altered. Fourth, the reports<br />

can be useful in educating department<br />

heads to the financial consequences of<br />

their decisions. Without such reports,<br />

department heads may be unable to<br />

make staffing and scheduling decisions<br />

which are consistent with the overall<br />

goals of efficiency and effectiveness.<br />

The controlling phase should be<br />

viewed as a feedback loop to the<br />

programming and budgeting phase.<br />

Analyzing performance will have little

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!