13.02.2013 Views

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 135 -<br />

The fourth requirement is largely met in<br />

that the assessment method traces the care<br />

received throughout an episode and relates<br />

it temporally to health status. However,<br />

causal linkages between process and<br />

health status are not established by the assessment<br />

and so outcome of care is not<br />

established. The number of health conditions<br />

available to use as tracers is expanded<br />

greatly by examliiiting only segments of the<br />

process of care rather than the entire process<br />

for every tracer, although this limits the<br />

conclusions that can be drawn about the<br />

continuity of the entire procer. jf care because<br />

the functions are not independent of<br />

one another. More work is needed to understand<br />

clearly how changes in one function<br />

influence the performance of others.<br />

The fifth requirement established<br />

criteria for the selection of tracers. These<br />

criteria have been met with the exception<br />

that the representativeness ofithe tracers as<br />

a group has not been demonstrated, as<br />

noted above.<br />

The sixth requirement establishes<br />

criteria for defining standards of care for'"<br />

the tracers. The standards established<br />

were both minimal and agreed upon by the<br />

local practitioners. The work of Brook 24<br />

suggests that because the assessment<br />

method uses explicit standards for the<br />

process of care rather than implicit judgments<br />

or indicators of outcome, the absolute<br />

performances will be relatively low.<br />

However, this is not important so long as<br />

the performance indicators are consistent<br />

over time and across comnponents, functions<br />

and consumer groups and their statistical<br />

attributes are not relatively worse than<br />

methods using implicit judgments or outcome<br />

indicators. More investigation of<br />

these assumptions is needed.<br />

Although the assessment method identifies<br />

areas of major deficiencies, it has not<br />

demonstrated that it systematically identifies<br />

remedial deficiencies, as called for in<br />

the seventh requirement. In order to determine<br />

if the deficiencies uncovered are<br />

able to be corrected, the assessment must<br />

be imbedded in an effective assurance<br />

process. Alternative possible remedies<br />

must be identified and evaluated and then<br />

implemented successfully. This is the<br />

point where other assessment methods<br />

have encountered the most difficulty, and<br />

it is widely recognized that assessments<br />

have not reliably led to improvements in<br />

quality.' 3 . 16.S4.25<br />

The eighth requirement deals with cost.<br />

Our experience indicates that the cust of<br />

employing this method in IHS service<br />

units is modest. Nonprofessionals were<br />

used successfully to collect and tabulate<br />

data from the nonstandardized health records<br />

currently found in Indian Health Service.<br />

In 10 service units it took 13 data<br />

collectors and two supervisors a total of 291<br />

working days to identiiy the cohorts and<br />

abstract data from the health records, plus<br />

another 69 working days to tabulate the<br />

data. Thus an average of 36 nonprofessional<br />

days was required to collect and<br />

tabulate the data per service unit. Each<br />

worker also spent eight days in training.<br />

On the average, data were abstracted from<br />

3.4 different health records for each consumer,<br />

with study cohorts of approximately<br />

50 consumers for each of nine tracers. This<br />

produces an average time for data collection<br />

and tabulation of 38.4 minutes per<br />

episode of care studied and 11.3 minutes<br />

per record abstracted.<br />

Others have also reported on the cost of<br />

data collection by nonprofessionals for<br />

episodes of care using explicit standards.<br />

Some agree with our experience that the<br />

cost is modest7 ' ' 0 while others have found<br />

it expensive."'16 Recent work by Albrecht<br />

and Kessner :t suggests that while the cost<br />

of abstracting may be modest, the' fixed<br />

1 Although not reflected in the above cost estimate,<br />

IHS is implementing a computerized health<br />

information system which integrates data from all the<br />

health records maintained for a given consumer. Once<br />

in operation, this system should significantly increase<br />

the efficiency of the assessment through its use of<br />

standardized encounter forms, a well-defined list of<br />

consumers from which to draw cohorts, and identification<br />

of the location of all relevent records.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!