13.02.2013 Views

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

BOOKS OF RtfiDIfGS - PAHO/WHO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 239 -<br />

AECOCL. Table 2. Eflect of Changc in Schedulcd<br />

Caincellation (SC) and Emergency Turnaway (ET)<br />

Rates on Maximum Average Occupancy<br />

Maximum average Average no.<br />

No. of o/<<br />

bds<br />

beds EMG<br />

%<br />

sched.uled<br />

occupancy SC + ET for<br />

1-3% con<br />

SC and SC and<br />

ET: 1-3% ET: 2/mo tra<br />

320 30 30 99.3 98.7 8.3<br />

320 30 90 94.6 90.6 25.6<br />

320 90 90 96.1 90. 21.9<br />

80 30 30 97.6 96.5 3.2<br />

80 30 90 90.7 87.3 5.4<br />

80 90 30 90.8 85.0 4.7<br />

*Fewer than two per month but as close to tw as posible.<br />

In general, if percent scheduled is below a certain level (approximately<br />

80-90 percent) or if patients are scheduled seven days a week,<br />

maximum average occupancy will increase as percent EMG dqcreases.<br />

It is advantageous (from a maximum average occupancy standpoint)<br />

to schedule seven days a week because no weekend drop-off<br />

then occurs. Figure 5a shows that when percent scheduled is high, the<br />

use of seven-day scheduling allows a higher maximum average occupancy<br />

than does the use of five-day scheduling. This is to be expected<br />

since the'weekend drop.off for five-day scheduling has a greater effect<br />

when percent scheduled is high. Thus, when sizing a facility it is necessary<br />

to be aware of how patients are to be scheduled.<br />

The results of varying mean LOS are shown in Fig. 5b, where it<br />

can be seen that mean LOS has a much smaller effect on maximum<br />

average occupancy than the other parameters do. In sizing larger<br />

facilities, the mean LOS will have little effect on the results, but the<br />

same cannot be said for small facilities (fewer than 40 beds).<br />

As mentioned previously, the maximum average occupancy is affected<br />

by percent cancellations and turnaways. In Table 2 the maximum<br />

average occupancy with the 1-3 percent constraint on cancellations<br />

and turnaways is compared with the maximum average occupancy<br />

with the sum of the cancellations and turnaways being less than<br />

but as close as possible to 2 per month. For 320 and 80 beds, the constraint<br />

change results in a decrease in the cancellations and turnaways<br />

and the maximum average occupancy also decreases. For comparison,<br />

the sum of cancellations and turnaways for the 1-3 percent constraint<br />

is also given in average occurrences per month. For purposes of<br />

planning or determining the number of beds needed, the scheduledcancellation<br />

and emergency.-turnaway rates should be viewed as a<br />

HEALTH matter of policy. Once agreement is reached on their acceptable level,<br />

LSEAR' CH lthen maximum average occupancies can be computed using the simulator.<br />

It should be noted here that the occupancy data for 320 beds<br />

are not strictly part of this research and are furnished only for their

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!