08.05.2013 Views

El dossier - Géminis Papeles de Salud

El dossier - Géminis Papeles de Salud

El dossier - Géminis Papeles de Salud

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11. Schol<strong>de</strong>lmayer WS. Public citizen update: competition and pricing Iisues in the pharmaceutical Market. Prime Institute.<br />

University of Minnesota, 2000. [ Links ]<br />

12. Soger A, Socolar D. Pharmaceutical marketing and research spending: the evi<strong>de</strong>nce does not support PhRMA´s claims.<br />

Presentado en: American Public Health Association Annual Meeting, 2001, Atlatanta, Gerogia. Se pue<strong>de</strong> encontrar en<br />

http:://dcc2.bumc.bu.edu/hs/ushealthreform.htm [ Links ]<br />

13. Prescription drugs and Mass Media adversiting. NIHCM, 2001. http://www.nichm.org/ DTCbcie/2001.pdf [ Links ]<br />

14. Bo<strong>de</strong>nheimer T.Uneasy alliance: clínica investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1539-<br />

1544 [ Links ]<br />

15. Esteve Soler J. La industria farmacéutica como la impulsora <strong>de</strong> la I+D en el sector sanitario. Revista <strong>de</strong> la administración<br />

sanitaria 1998; 11(7):1-9 [ Links ]<br />

16. Ferrán Mercadé M. La financiación <strong>de</strong> las socieda<strong>de</strong>s científicas y la industria farmacéutica. Atención Primaria 2002;29:327-<br />

328 [ Links ]<br />

17. Freemantle N An<strong>de</strong>rson IM, Young P. Predictive value of pharmacological activity for the relative efficacy of anti<strong>de</strong>pressant<br />

illness: a randomized double blind controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177:292-302. [ Links ]<br />

18. Moncrieff J. Are anti<strong>de</strong>pressants overrated? A review of metodological problems in anti<strong>de</strong>pressant trials. J Nerv Ment Dis 2001;<br />

189: 288-295 [ Links ]<br />

19. Mata Ruiz I, Ortiz lobo A. Sesgos y dificulta<strong>de</strong>s en la investigación <strong>de</strong> los nuevos antipsicóticos. Rev Asoc Esp Neuropsiq; 2001,<br />

79: 57-74. [ Links ]<br />

20. Smith R. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record (editorial). BMJ 2001; 323:588 [ Links ]<br />

21. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability (editorial). The Lancet 2001; 358: 854-856. [ Links ]<br />

22. Just how tainted has medicine become? (editorial). The Lancet 2002; 359: [ Links ]<br />

23. Fernán<strong>de</strong>z Liria A. La nueva <strong>de</strong>smedicalización <strong>de</strong> la Psiquiatría. Psiquiatría Pública 1998; 10(2): 81-82. [ Links ]<br />

24. Scandal of scientists who take money for papers ghostwritten by drug companies. The Guardian 7 <strong>de</strong> Febrero<br />

2002. [ Links ]<br />

25. Gilbody SM, Song F, Eastwood AJ, Sutton A. The causes, consequences and <strong>de</strong>tection of publication bias in psychiatry. Acta<br />

Psychiatr Scand 2000;102: 241.249. [ Links ]<br />

26. Couhdry NK, Stelfox HT, Detsky AS. Relations between Authors of clinical practice gui<strong>de</strong>lines and the pramaceutical industry.<br />

JAMA 2002; 287:612-617 [ Links ]<br />

27. Sheldon TA, Smith GD. Consensus conferences as drug promotion. The Lancet 1993; 334: 100-102. [ Links ]<br />

28. Interacctions with the pharmacuetical Industry: experiences and attitu<strong>de</strong>s of psychiatric resi<strong>de</strong>nts, interns and clerks. CMAJ,<br />

1995; 153:553 [ Links ]<br />

29. Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. Is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA 2000; 283: 373-380 [ Links ]<br />

30. Peay MY, Peay ER. The role of commercial sources in the adoption of a new drug. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26: 1183-<br />

1189. [ Links ]<br />

31. Lexchin J. Interactions between physicians and pharmaceutical industry. CMAJ 1993; 149: 1401-1407.) [ Links ]<br />

32. Haayer F. Rational prescribing and sources of information. Soc Sci Med 1982; 16: 2017-2023 [ Links ]<br />

33. Wolfe SM. Why do American drug companies spend more than $12 billion a year pushing drugs? Is it education or promotion? J<br />

Gen Intern Med 1996; 11: 637-639 [ Links ]<br />

34. Randall T. Kennedy hearings say no more free lunch - or much else - from drug firms. JAMA 1991; 265: 440-442 [ Links ]<br />

35. Coyle SL. Physician-Industry relations. Part 1: individual physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002; 136(5): 396-<br />

402. [ Links ]<br />

36. Komesaroff PA, Kerridge IH. Ethical issues concerning the relations between medical practitiones and the phramaceutical<br />

industry. The medical journal of Australia 2002; 176(3): 118-121 [ Links ]<br />

37. Memoirs of methods used to sell drugs. MaLAM 1999; March/April Vol 17 Nº 3/ 4.<br />

http://www.healthyskepticism.org/editions/IN9903.htm [ Links ]<br />

38. Coyle SL. Physician-Industry relations. Part 2: Organizational issues. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002; 136(5): 403-<br />

406. [ Links ]<br />

39. Bowman MA. The impact of drug company funding on the content of continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof<br />

1986; 6:66 [ Links ]<br />

40. Bowman MA, Pearle DL. Changes in drug prescribing patterns related to commercial company funding of continuing medical<br />

education. J Contin Educ Health Prof., 1988; 8:13-20) [ Links ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!