El dossier - Géminis Papeles de Salud
El dossier - Géminis Papeles de Salud
El dossier - Géminis Papeles de Salud
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
11. Schol<strong>de</strong>lmayer WS. Public citizen update: competition and pricing Iisues in the pharmaceutical Market. Prime Institute.<br />
University of Minnesota, 2000. [ Links ]<br />
12. Soger A, Socolar D. Pharmaceutical marketing and research spending: the evi<strong>de</strong>nce does not support PhRMA´s claims.<br />
Presentado en: American Public Health Association Annual Meeting, 2001, Atlatanta, Gerogia. Se pue<strong>de</strong> encontrar en<br />
http:://dcc2.bumc.bu.edu/hs/ushealthreform.htm [ Links ]<br />
13. Prescription drugs and Mass Media adversiting. NIHCM, 2001. http://www.nichm.org/ DTCbcie/2001.pdf [ Links ]<br />
14. Bo<strong>de</strong>nheimer T.Uneasy alliance: clínica investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1539-<br />
1544 [ Links ]<br />
15. Esteve Soler J. La industria farmacéutica como la impulsora <strong>de</strong> la I+D en el sector sanitario. Revista <strong>de</strong> la administración<br />
sanitaria 1998; 11(7):1-9 [ Links ]<br />
16. Ferrán Mercadé M. La financiación <strong>de</strong> las socieda<strong>de</strong>s científicas y la industria farmacéutica. Atención Primaria 2002;29:327-<br />
328 [ Links ]<br />
17. Freemantle N An<strong>de</strong>rson IM, Young P. Predictive value of pharmacological activity for the relative efficacy of anti<strong>de</strong>pressant<br />
illness: a randomized double blind controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177:292-302. [ Links ]<br />
18. Moncrieff J. Are anti<strong>de</strong>pressants overrated? A review of metodological problems in anti<strong>de</strong>pressant trials. J Nerv Ment Dis 2001;<br />
189: 288-295 [ Links ]<br />
19. Mata Ruiz I, Ortiz lobo A. Sesgos y dificulta<strong>de</strong>s en la investigación <strong>de</strong> los nuevos antipsicóticos. Rev Asoc Esp Neuropsiq; 2001,<br />
79: 57-74. [ Links ]<br />
20. Smith R. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record (editorial). BMJ 2001; 323:588 [ Links ]<br />
21. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability (editorial). The Lancet 2001; 358: 854-856. [ Links ]<br />
22. Just how tainted has medicine become? (editorial). The Lancet 2002; 359: [ Links ]<br />
23. Fernán<strong>de</strong>z Liria A. La nueva <strong>de</strong>smedicalización <strong>de</strong> la Psiquiatría. Psiquiatría Pública 1998; 10(2): 81-82. [ Links ]<br />
24. Scandal of scientists who take money for papers ghostwritten by drug companies. The Guardian 7 <strong>de</strong> Febrero<br />
2002. [ Links ]<br />
25. Gilbody SM, Song F, Eastwood AJ, Sutton A. The causes, consequences and <strong>de</strong>tection of publication bias in psychiatry. Acta<br />
Psychiatr Scand 2000;102: 241.249. [ Links ]<br />
26. Couhdry NK, Stelfox HT, Detsky AS. Relations between Authors of clinical practice gui<strong>de</strong>lines and the pramaceutical industry.<br />
JAMA 2002; 287:612-617 [ Links ]<br />
27. Sheldon TA, Smith GD. Consensus conferences as drug promotion. The Lancet 1993; 334: 100-102. [ Links ]<br />
28. Interacctions with the pharmacuetical Industry: experiences and attitu<strong>de</strong>s of psychiatric resi<strong>de</strong>nts, interns and clerks. CMAJ,<br />
1995; 153:553 [ Links ]<br />
29. Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. Is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA 2000; 283: 373-380 [ Links ]<br />
30. Peay MY, Peay ER. The role of commercial sources in the adoption of a new drug. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26: 1183-<br />
1189. [ Links ]<br />
31. Lexchin J. Interactions between physicians and pharmaceutical industry. CMAJ 1993; 149: 1401-1407.) [ Links ]<br />
32. Haayer F. Rational prescribing and sources of information. Soc Sci Med 1982; 16: 2017-2023 [ Links ]<br />
33. Wolfe SM. Why do American drug companies spend more than $12 billion a year pushing drugs? Is it education or promotion? J<br />
Gen Intern Med 1996; 11: 637-639 [ Links ]<br />
34. Randall T. Kennedy hearings say no more free lunch - or much else - from drug firms. JAMA 1991; 265: 440-442 [ Links ]<br />
35. Coyle SL. Physician-Industry relations. Part 1: individual physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002; 136(5): 396-<br />
402. [ Links ]<br />
36. Komesaroff PA, Kerridge IH. Ethical issues concerning the relations between medical practitiones and the phramaceutical<br />
industry. The medical journal of Australia 2002; 176(3): 118-121 [ Links ]<br />
37. Memoirs of methods used to sell drugs. MaLAM 1999; March/April Vol 17 Nº 3/ 4.<br />
http://www.healthyskepticism.org/editions/IN9903.htm [ Links ]<br />
38. Coyle SL. Physician-Industry relations. Part 2: Organizational issues. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002; 136(5): 403-<br />
406. [ Links ]<br />
39. Bowman MA. The impact of drug company funding on the content of continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof<br />
1986; 6:66 [ Links ]<br />
40. Bowman MA, Pearle DL. Changes in drug prescribing patterns related to commercial company funding of continuing medical<br />
education. J Contin Educ Health Prof., 1988; 8:13-20) [ Links ]