Réunion d'experts FAO/OMS sur l'application des nanotechnologies ...

Références
consommations et l’environnement (COT, COM, COC). http://cot.food.gov.uk/
pdfs/cotstatementnanomats200701.pdf
CSRSEN (Comité scientifique des risques sanitaires émergents et nouveaux). 2005.
Opinion on the appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks
associated with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies. Adopté par
le CSRSEN lors de sa 7 ème réunion plénière des 28 et 29 septembre 2005.
CSRSEN (Comité scientifique des risques sanitaires émergents et nouveaux). 2006.
The appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks with
engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies. Adopté lors de la 10 ème
réunion plénière du 26 mars 2006, après consultation publique.
CSRSEN (Comité scientifique des risques sanitaires émergents et nouveaux). 2007a.
Opinion on the appropriateness of the risk assessment methodology in accordance with
the technical guidance documents for new and existing substances for assessing the risks
of nanomaterials. Adopté lors de la 19 ème réunion plénière des 21 et 22 juin 2007,
après consultation publique
CSRSEN (Comité scientifique des risques sanitaires émergents et nouveaux). 2007b.
Opinion on the scientific aspects of the existing and proposed definitions relating to
products of nanoscience and nanotechnologies, adopté le 29 novembre 2007.
Currall, S.C., King, E.B., Lane, N., Madera, J. & Turner, S. 2006. What drives public
acceptance of nanotechnology? Nature Nanotechnol., 1: 153–155.
Cyras, V.P., Manfredi, L.B., Ton-That, M.-T. & Vázquez, A. 2008. Physical and
mechanical properties of thermoplastic starch/montmorillonite nanocomposite films.
Carbohydr. Polym., 73:55–63.
Davis, J.M. 2007. How to assess the risks of nanotechnology: learning from past
experience. J. Nanosci. Nanotech., 7: 402–409.
De Jong, W.H., Hagens, W.I., Krystek, P., Burger, M.C., Sips, A.J. & Geertsma, R.E.
2008. Particle size-dependent organ distribution of gold nanoparticles after
intravenous administration. Biomaterials, 29(12): 1912–1919.
Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2007. Characterising the
potential risks posed by engineered nanoparticles – a second UK Government research
report. Londres, HM Government. www.defra.gov.uk
des Rieux, A., Fievez, V., Garinot, M., Schneider, Y.J. & Preat, V. 2006. Nanoparticles
as potential oral delivery systems of proteins and vaccines: a mechanistic approach.
J. Control. Release, 116(1): 1–27.
Donaldson, K. & Borm, P. 2004. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, a new journal to meet a
real need. Part. Fibre Toxicol., 1(1): 1.
Donaldson, K., Aitken, R., Tran, L., Stone, V., Duffin, R. & Forrest, G., et al. 2006.
Carbon nanotubes: a review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology
and workplace safety. Toxicol. Sci., 92: 5–22.
Donaldson, K., Stone, V., Clouter, A., Renwick, L. & MacNee, W. 2001. Ultrafine
particles. Occup. Environ. Med., 58(3): 211–216. 199.
Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A.B. 1982. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of
technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley, University of California Press.
83
Réunion d’experts FAO/OMS sur l’application des nanotechnologies dans
les secteurs de l’alimentation et de l’agriculture: incidences possibles sur la sécurité alimentaire