Lorna Irv<strong>in</strong>eZon<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Canada</strong>’s ZeitgeistAdam, Ian <strong>and</strong> Helen Tiff<strong>in</strong>, eds., Past the Last Post: Theoriz<strong>in</strong>g Post-Colonialism <strong>and</strong> Post-Modernism, Calgary, University of Calgary Press,1990, 214 p.Lecker, Robert, ed., Canadian Canons: Essays <strong>in</strong> Literary Value, Toronto,University of Toronto Press, 1991, 251 p.Söderl<strong>in</strong>d, Sylvia, Marg<strong>in</strong>/Alias: Language <strong>and</strong> Colonization <strong>in</strong> Canadian<strong>and</strong> Québécois Fiction, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1991,264 p.These three books extend several of the categories constructed by W.H. New<strong>in</strong> his discussion of contemporary English-Canadian criticism <strong>and</strong> theory <strong>in</strong>the 1990 Spr<strong>in</strong>g/Fall edition of the International Journal of Canadian Studies.Devoted to issues of power <strong>and</strong> authority, each is <strong>in</strong>tent on broaden<strong>in</strong>g thescope of Canadian theory, som<strong>et</strong>imes by creat<strong>in</strong>g dialogues b<strong>et</strong>ween <strong>Canada</strong><strong>and</strong> Québec, other times by situat<strong>in</strong>g Canadian literature with<strong>in</strong> a globalframework. Past the Last Post raises wide-rang<strong>in</strong>g questions about themean<strong>in</strong>g of the term “post-colonialism” by look<strong>in</strong>g at literatures <strong>from</strong> differentp<strong>arts</strong> of the world. Canadian Canons emphasizes the personal <strong>and</strong> publicpolitics <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> choos<strong>in</strong>g books that will become <strong>Canada</strong>’s majorrepresentative texts. Marg<strong>in</strong>/Alias <strong>in</strong>vestigates the ways <strong>in</strong> which <strong>la</strong>nguageb<strong>et</strong>rays various states of colonization, concentrat<strong>in</strong>g specifically on Canadian<strong>and</strong> Québécois literatures. All three books reflect current debate aboutauthority, marg<strong>in</strong>ality, <strong>and</strong> conflict. By engag<strong>in</strong>g English-Canadian <strong>and</strong>Québécois works <strong>in</strong> such debates, each broadens the scope <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence ofAnglophone literary theory both <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>and</strong> abroad. In their efforts to markout a specifically Canadian territory, these books concentrate on def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gterm<strong>in</strong>ology. Although occasionally defensive about the degree ofsophistication of the Canadian critical project, they <strong>in</strong>vest new authority <strong>in</strong>their subject <strong>and</strong> the reaction it generates.Past the Last Post, the most broadly based of the books, beg<strong>in</strong>s by address<strong>in</strong>gthe divided agenda of current approaches to colonization. Some theorists<strong>in</strong>terpr<strong>et</strong> post-colonialism as the efforts of formerly marg<strong>in</strong>alized groups to<strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>and</strong> transform the coloniz<strong>in</strong>g strategies that comb<strong>in</strong>ed to keep themsilent. Other <strong>in</strong>terpr<strong>et</strong>ations of post-colonialism suggest the importance ofdifference, <strong>and</strong> advocate separation as a form of resistance to imperial powers.While the book’s essays differ <strong>in</strong> perspective—some more theor<strong>et</strong>ical thanInternational Journal of Canadian Studies / Revue <strong>in</strong>ternationale d’études canadiennes6, Fall/Automne 1992
IJCS/RIÉCothers—each addresses term<strong>in</strong>ology, emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g a few simi<strong>la</strong>rities <strong>and</strong>differences among various “posts”: post-modernism, post-structuralism, postcolonialism.Several critics suggest that post-modernism, with its emphasis onthe death of the subject, works <strong>in</strong> opposition to post-colonialism because itdiscredits <strong>in</strong>dividualism <strong>and</strong> personal authority, whereas formerly colonizedpeople underst<strong>and</strong>ably yearn for a voice <strong>and</strong> authority of their own. Postmodernismalso discredits the k<strong>in</strong>d of nationalism (<strong>and</strong> national identity)particu<strong>la</strong>rly important <strong>in</strong> post-colonial situations. While most “posts”recognize contemporary breaks with tradition, often through the use of parody,<strong>and</strong> acknowledge the importance of <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g many different voices <strong>in</strong> anyrepresentation of reality, the editors of Past the Last Post emphasize that postcolonialisttheorists need to search out the pasts of groups that have been“‘Othered’ by a history of European representation,” so that the formerlycolonized can reject such “other<strong>in</strong>g” (x).Several critics want post-colonial read<strong>in</strong>gs of post-modernism to compensatefor the <strong>la</strong>tter’s globalism, <strong>and</strong> almost all agree that the various “posts” havehelped erode the “centrality of British literature <strong>and</strong> canon-based studieswith<strong>in</strong> academic <strong>in</strong>stitutions” (xv). They po<strong>in</strong>t to the contemporary vari<strong>et</strong>y ofliterary works <strong>in</strong> English that form college syl<strong>la</strong>bi. Stephen Slemon, <strong>in</strong>“Modernism’s Last Post,” argues that the term “post-colonial” is most useful“not when it is used synonymously with a post-<strong>in</strong>dependence historical period<strong>in</strong> once-colonized nations but rather when it locates a specifically anti-or postcolonialdiscursive purchase <strong>in</strong> culture.” This post-colonial purchase, Slemon<strong>in</strong>sists, “beg<strong>in</strong>s the moment that colonial power <strong>in</strong>scribes itself onto the body<strong>and</strong> space of its Others <strong>and</strong> which cont<strong>in</strong>ues as an often occulted tradition <strong>in</strong>tothe modern theatre of neo-colonialist <strong>in</strong>ternational re<strong>la</strong>tions” (3). In“Decoloniz<strong>in</strong>g the Map,” Graham Huggan illustrates the fasc<strong>in</strong>ation of postcolonialwriters with the image of the map, emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g the ways <strong>in</strong> whichmaps are “shift<strong>in</strong>g grounds” (132) that reveal not only territorial changes butalso new physical configurations that move cartography “away <strong>from</strong> the desirefor homogeneity towards an acceptance of diversity” (132). Both Slemon <strong>and</strong>Huggan defend recuperation (of <strong>la</strong>nguage; of history; of l<strong>and</strong>) as the majorproject of post-colonialism.The f<strong>in</strong>al two papers emphasize Canadian literature, <strong>and</strong> are connected. In“‘Circl<strong>in</strong>g the Downspout of Empire’,” L<strong>in</strong>da Hutcheon stresses the commonex-centricity <strong>and</strong> doubled vision of post-colonialism <strong>and</strong> post-modernism. Asshe has commented elsewhere—for example, <strong>in</strong> The Canadian Postmodern,where she suggests that “postmodernism offers a context <strong>in</strong> which tounderst<strong>and</strong> the valu<strong>in</strong>g of difference <strong>in</strong> a way that makes particu<strong>la</strong>r sense <strong>in</strong><strong>Canada</strong>” (Preface ix)—she argues here that the structures of magic realism <strong>and</strong>the rh<strong>et</strong>orical strategies of irony <strong>and</strong> allegory are common to both discourses,although she also emphasizes that the two are not <strong>in</strong>terchangeable. Postmodernism,she notes, unlike post-colonialism, exhibits considerable politica<strong>la</strong>mbivalence. Like other critics, she acknowledges the somewhat neo-colonialtendencies of post-modernism, exhibited particu<strong>la</strong>rly <strong>in</strong> a bl<strong>in</strong>dness to Native154