part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
120 Part3: Summary <strong>of</strong> country studies – Bangladesh <strong>and</strong> Viet Nam<br />
1. Economic <strong>and</strong> Technical Data<br />
(1) Economic Data<br />
Steam Turb<strong>in</strong>e: Thermal Match<br />
Fuel Name Oil<br />
Fuel Net Calorific Value MJ/kg 39<br />
Unit <strong>of</strong> Fuel Purchased (e.g. kg, m 3 , litre) kg<br />
Fuel Purchase Price Peso/kg 2.20<br />
Fuel Price Escalation Rate % 5.0<br />
Conventional Boiler O & M Cost (% <strong>of</strong> Equipment Cost) % 5.0<br />
CHP O&M Costs (% <strong>of</strong> Total Installation Cost) % 2.0<br />
Escalation Rate for O & M Costs % 5.0<br />
St<strong>and</strong>by Capacity kW 500<br />
Insurance Cost (as % <strong>of</strong> book value <strong>of</strong> equipment) % 5.0<br />
Service Life <strong>of</strong> Cogeneration Facilities Years 15<br />
Salvage Value <strong>of</strong> Cogeneration Facilities Peso 0<br />
(2) Technical Data<br />
Heat Dem<strong>and</strong> to Be Met by CHP Boiler kg/hr 5,000<br />
CHP Boiler Work<strong>in</strong>g Pressure Bar 40<br />
Process Steam Pressure Bar 7<br />
Total Installation Cost Peso 12,222,440<br />
2. Energy Analysis<br />
(1) CHP Power to Heat Ratio kW e /kW th<br />
(2) Power<br />
0.106<br />
kW/(ton/hr Steam) 81.7<br />
Site Electricity Requirement MWh/yr 12,715<br />
Power Generat<strong>in</strong>g Capacity kW 408<br />
Electricity Generation MWh/yr 3,059<br />
Deficit(-)/Excess(+ ) Power MWh/yr -9,656<br />
(3) Heat<br />
Site Heat Requirement TJ/yr 158.0<br />
Heat Generation TJ/yr 103.4<br />
Heat Utilisation TJ/yr 103.4<br />
Deficit(-)/Excess(+ ) Heat TJ/yr -54.6<br />
(4) Fuel<br />
CHP Fuel Consumption TJ/yr 129.1<br />
Fuel Sav<strong>in</strong>g Compared with Conventional Production % 22.2
Change language