07.04.2013 Views

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72 Part II: Cogeneration experiences <strong>in</strong> Asia <strong>and</strong> elsewhere<br />

Air<br />

4700 kW<br />

G<br />

Fuel<br />

16.7 MW<br />

Figure 2.3 Gas turb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>cogeneration</strong> option for the textile mill<br />

The <strong>in</strong>vestment, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the custom duty <strong>and</strong> tax, amounted to US$ 1,617/kW. The annual<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance cost was taken as 2.5 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total <strong>in</strong>vestment, i.e., US$ 190,000.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> drawback <strong>of</strong> this option was the high price <strong>of</strong> diesel oil required <strong>in</strong> the gas turb<strong>in</strong>e<br />

that led to a long payback period. The cost <strong>of</strong> diesel oil is US$ 0.19/litre as compared with<br />

US$ 0.12 /litre for heavy fuel oil. Moreover, the former has a lower heat<strong>in</strong>g value as compared<br />

with the latter (36 MJ/litre versus 39.1 MJ/litre).<br />

2.3.4 Option 3: comb<strong>in</strong>ed cycle<br />

As can be seen <strong>in</strong> the schematic diagram <strong>of</strong> this option <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.4, this is a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />

the first two options. As a result, the comb<strong>in</strong>ed power generation from the gas turb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong><br />

steam turb<strong>in</strong>e reaches 6.8 MW. This allows the plant to be self-sufficient dur<strong>in</strong>g 93 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

the year. The <strong>in</strong>vestment cost, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g taxes, was computed as US$ 2,000/kW <strong>and</strong> the<br />

annual ma<strong>in</strong>tenance cost was taken as 2.5 per cent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>vestment.<br />

As <strong>in</strong> the previous case, the ma<strong>in</strong> disadvantage <strong>of</strong> this system is the need for diesel as fuel,<br />

which has a much higher cost when compared with heavy fuel oil.<br />

2.3.5 Option 4: diesel eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Exhaust<br />

18.8 kg/s<br />

545 o C<br />

C T<br />

Water: 70 o C<br />

11.5 t/hr<br />

(0.94 MW)<br />

160 o C<br />

Supplementary<br />

Fir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Fuel: 200 kW<br />

56 bar/271 º C<br />

5.5 t/h,<br />

(4.26 kW)<br />

12 bar/188 º C<br />

6 t/h,<br />

(4.64 kW)<br />

Steam<br />

56 bar/271º C<br />

1.05 t/h,<br />

(0.81 kW)<br />

Water<br />

120 º C<br />

12.55 t/h (1.76 kW)<br />

This configuration consists <strong>of</strong> a diesel eng<strong>in</strong>e with heat recovery steam boiler with auxiliary<br />

fuel fir<strong>in</strong>g option, as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.5. The <strong>in</strong>vestment cost, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g taxes, was estimated<br />

to be US$ 1,500/kW. This option provided the best economic result for the factory. Though the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g 2 diesel eng<strong>in</strong>es for generat<strong>in</strong>g more power <strong>and</strong> sell<strong>in</strong>g to the utility grid<br />

was explored <strong>and</strong> led to higher economic returns, the factory management was <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong><br />

this alternative.<br />

H<br />

RS<br />

G

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!