part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
90 Part II: Cogeneration experiences <strong>in</strong> Asia <strong>and</strong> elsewhere<br />
responsibility for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>its</strong> projects by committ<strong>in</strong>g to implement the project <strong>in</strong> time <strong>and</strong><br />
guarantee<strong>in</strong>g performance. It can <strong>of</strong>fer to co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate project f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g for the client by gett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> touch with f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />
3.5 Spa<strong>in</strong>’s Energy Policy Favour<strong>in</strong>g Cogeneration Development<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> the fact that Spa<strong>in</strong> has a milder climate <strong>and</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dustrial base which is less<br />
developed as compared with the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s or Germany, the country has emerged as one<br />
<strong>of</strong> Europe’s leader <strong>in</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong>. This is a direct consequence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
energy policies favour<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cogeneration</strong>.<br />
The country has demonstrated that clear policy actions can lead to the development <strong>of</strong><br />
effective tools, ensur<strong>in</strong>g rapid <strong>cogeneration</strong> growth <strong>and</strong> reap<strong>in</strong>g the energy, economic <strong>and</strong><br />
environmental benef<strong>its</strong> associated with it. It has also set an example <strong>of</strong> how such a<br />
promotional policy can lead to some adverse effects if it is not undertaken <strong>in</strong> a broader<br />
perspective <strong>of</strong> long-term susta<strong>in</strong>able energy plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a country.<br />
The policies developed by the national authorities <strong>in</strong> the late 80s sent a very positive signal to<br />
the market <strong>and</strong> favoured <strong>cogeneration</strong> to an extent beyond what was projected <strong>in</strong> 1990. The<br />
scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>centive tariffs announced led to payback periods as low as 3 years. Cogeneration<br />
appeared to have become such a lucrative activity that some cogenerators sold all the<br />
electricity generated <strong>in</strong> their plant to the grid <strong>and</strong> met their own power needs by buy<strong>in</strong>g it from<br />
the grid at a cheaper rate than their sell<strong>in</strong>g price. The rationale beh<strong>in</strong>d this <strong>in</strong>centive tariff is<br />
that the cogenerator takes the bulk <strong>of</strong> the project risk <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g up-front capital <strong>and</strong><br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g a short term purchase contract. However, the Association <strong>of</strong> Electricity Self-producers<br />
(AAEE) counters this by po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g out that the number <strong>of</strong> cogenerators actually enjoy<strong>in</strong>g such<br />
high pr<strong>of</strong>itability is very marg<strong>in</strong>al. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>cogeneration</strong> projects have helped to<br />
save over 15 billion Ptas annually <strong>in</strong> oil imports.<br />
The evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> has been entirely <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustrial sector, <strong>of</strong>ten with the<br />
<strong>part</strong>icipation <strong>of</strong> the power sector. An energy conservation law established <strong>in</strong> 1980 provided<br />
attractive legal framework for electricity self-generation <strong>and</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> through tariff<br />
<strong>in</strong>centives. The tariff at which electricity was purchased by the utilities even exceeded avoided<br />
costs but these were passed on to the consumer by the utility. Guaranteed electricity supply<br />
to the utilities fetched the highest rates. However <strong>cogeneration</strong> did not develop fast till 1986<br />
<strong>and</strong> most utilities were opposed to <strong>cogeneration</strong> development. The Institute for Diversification<br />
<strong>and</strong> Promotion <strong>of</strong> Energy (IDAE) started promot<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> 1986 through <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
dissem<strong>in</strong>ation programmes, advisory services, third <strong>part</strong>y f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g, etc.<br />
As a <strong>part</strong> <strong>of</strong> the national energy plan, major <strong>in</strong>itiatives were undertaken by the Plan for Energy<br />
Conservation (PAEE) <strong>in</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> energy conservation <strong>and</strong> substitution, <strong>cogeneration</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
renewable energies. The <strong>cogeneration</strong> programme set a target for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cogeneration</strong><br />
capacity from 959 MW <strong>in</strong> 1990 to 2,222 MW by the year 2000 (see Figure 3.2). The annual<br />
contribution from <strong>cogeneration</strong> was expected to <strong>in</strong>crease from 4,708 GWh <strong>in</strong> 1990 to 14,227<br />
GWh <strong>in</strong> 2000, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 42,000 toe <strong>of</strong> annual fuel sav<strong>in</strong>g.