07.04.2013 Views

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

126 Part3: Summary <strong>of</strong> country studies – Bangladesh <strong>and</strong> Viet Nam<br />

1. Economic <strong>and</strong> Technical Data<br />

(1). Economic Data<br />

GAS TURBINE: THERMAL MATCH<br />

Fuel Name Diesel<br />

Fuel Net Calorific Value MJ/kg 39<br />

Unit <strong>of</strong> Fuel Purchased (e.g. kg, m 3 , litre) kg<br />

Fuel Purchase Price Peso/kg 2.65<br />

Fuel Price Escalation Rate % 5.0<br />

Boiler O & M Cost (% <strong>of</strong> Boiler Cost) % 5.0<br />

CHP O&M Cost (% <strong>of</strong> Installation Costs) % 2.5<br />

Escalation Rate for O&M Costs % 5.0<br />

St<strong>and</strong>by Capacity kW 500<br />

Insurance Cost (as % <strong>of</strong> book value <strong>of</strong> equipment) % 1.0<br />

Service Life <strong>of</strong> Cogeneration Facilities Years 15<br />

Salvage Value <strong>of</strong> Cogeneration Facilities Peso 0<br />

(2) Technical Data<br />

Heat Dem<strong>and</strong> to be Met by CHP Boiler kg/hr 5,000<br />

Steam Process Pressure Steam Pressure Bar 7<br />

Waste Heat Boiler Efficiency % 65.0<br />

Total Installation Cost Peso 90,828,571<br />

2. Energy Analysis<br />

(1) CHP Power to Heat Ratio kW e /kW th 0.74<br />

(2). Power<br />

kW/(ton/hr Steam) 498.6<br />

Site Electricity Requirement MWh/yr 12,715<br />

Power Generat<strong>in</strong>g Capacity kW 2,493<br />

Electricity Generation MWh/yr 18,673<br />

Deficit(-)/Excess(+ ) Power MWh 5,958<br />

(3). Heat<br />

Site Heat Requirement TJ/yr 158<br />

Heat Generation TJ/yr 103<br />

Heat Utilisation TJ/yr 103<br />

Deficit(-)/Excess(+ ) Heat TJ/yr -55<br />

(4). Fuel<br />

CHP Fuel Consumption TJ/yr 268.9<br />

Fuel Sav<strong>in</strong>g Compared with Conventional Production % 23.9<br />

3. F<strong>in</strong>ancial Analysis<br />

Internal Rate <strong>of</strong> Return % 15.2<br />

Net Present Value Peso 1,218,335<br />

Discounted Pay-back Period Year 14.64<br />

4. Summary: Gas Turb<strong>in</strong>e, Thermal Match<br />

Technical Parameters<br />

Process Steam Pressure Bar 7<br />

Power Generat<strong>in</strong>g Capacity kW 2,493<br />

Steam Generat<strong>in</strong>g Capacity kg/hr 5,000<br />

Power to Heat Ratio 0.74<br />

Energy Analysis Results<br />

kW/(ton/hr Steam) 498.6<br />

Excess (+)/Deficit (-) Power MWh/yr 5,958<br />

Excess (+)/ Deficit(-) Heat TJ/yr -55<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial Analysis Results<br />

Internal Rate <strong>of</strong> Return % 15.2<br />

Net Present Value Peso 1,218,335<br />

Discounted Pay-back Period Year 14.64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!