part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
170 Part3: Summary <strong>of</strong> country studies – Bangladesh <strong>and</strong> Viet Nam<br />
IRR (%) 31.7 17.1 25.2 27.9<br />
NPV (million VND) 26,224 8,897 36,288 42,189<br />
Total <strong>in</strong>stallation cost (million VND) 23,952 68,831 57,552 52,438<br />
Pay back period (year) 6 13 7 6<br />
The average power-to-heat ratio is 0.275, for which steam turb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>cogeneration</strong> seems<br />
suitable. Four alternatives are considered for the analysis, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g steam turb<strong>in</strong>e us<strong>in</strong>g coal,<br />
reciprocat<strong>in</strong>g eng<strong>in</strong>e us<strong>in</strong>g fuel oil, <strong>and</strong> gas turb<strong>in</strong>e us<strong>in</strong>g natural gas. The results <strong>of</strong> the<br />
analysis for this company are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4.5.<br />
Alternative 1 seems to be the most attractive option s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>its</strong> IRR <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment cost are the<br />
lowest among the four alternatives considered. The ma<strong>in</strong> advantage <strong>of</strong> this alternative is<br />
derived from the use <strong>of</strong> coal, which is a cheap fuel. However, it can satisfy a little more than<br />
30 per cent <strong>of</strong> the company’s electricity dem<strong>and</strong>. Alternative 2 can take care <strong>of</strong> all the power<br />
<strong>and</strong> heat dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the factory but <strong>its</strong> IRR is the lowest <strong>and</strong> <strong>its</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment cost is the<br />
highest among the four alternatives.<br />
Alternative 3 is also very attractive but <strong>its</strong> IRR is lower <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment cost is higher than<br />
those for the first alternative.<br />
The alternative 4 can also meet all the energy needs <strong>of</strong> the site <strong>and</strong> has a fairly high IRR but<br />
natural gas is presently not available at the site.<br />
4.3.4 Paper mill “D”<br />
This is a big paper mill <strong>in</strong> Dông Nai prov<strong>in</strong>ce, with a capacity to produce 170 tons <strong>of</strong> paper per<br />
day. The factory has a condens<strong>in</strong>g steam turb<strong>in</strong>e power generator but it is not used. The<br />
company functions dur<strong>in</strong>g 3 shifts per day, 300 days per year. It is presently connected to the<br />
national grid to take care <strong>of</strong> all <strong>its</strong> power needs. The power supply reliability is essential for<br />
the company for <strong>its</strong> production process. Self-generation with <strong>in</strong>terconnection to the national<br />
grid could be a good solution for the company <strong>in</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g difficult situation <strong>of</strong> the power<br />
sector.<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> the electricity <strong>and</strong> steam consumption data allows to conclude the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
• Total Annual Electricity Consumption: 48,645 MWh<br />
• Maximum Electricity Dem<strong>and</strong>: 7.66 MW<br />
• M<strong>in</strong>imum Electricity Dem<strong>and</strong>: 3.84 MW<br />
• Total Annual Fuel Oil Consumption: 13.8 million litres<br />
• Total Annual Steam Use: 164,721 tons<br />
• Maximum Steam Dem<strong>and</strong>: 29.1 tons/hr<br />
• M<strong>in</strong>imum Steam Dem<strong>and</strong>: 11.1 ton/hr<br />
With an average power-to-heat ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.39 for the factory, the steam turb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>cogeneration</strong><br />
configuration seems the most suitable. The analysis for the Paper Company “D” was done<br />
with three configurations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g steam turb<strong>in</strong>e, reciprocat<strong>in</strong>g eng<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> gas turb<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>in</strong><br />
order to make a comparison. The results <strong>of</strong> the analysis for this company are shown <strong>in</strong> Table<br />
4.6.<br />
Among the above four alternatives, Alternative 2 seems to be the best s<strong>in</strong>ce it gives a high<br />
IRR <strong>and</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g fuel supply availability <strong>in</strong>to consideration. The alternative 4 with natural gas as<br />
fuel seems to be the most attractive option but natural gas is not presently available at the<br />
site.