07.04.2013 Views

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

170 Part3: Summary <strong>of</strong> country studies – Bangladesh <strong>and</strong> Viet Nam<br />

IRR (%) 31.7 17.1 25.2 27.9<br />

NPV (million VND) 26,224 8,897 36,288 42,189<br />

Total <strong>in</strong>stallation cost (million VND) 23,952 68,831 57,552 52,438<br />

Pay back period (year) 6 13 7 6<br />

The average power-to-heat ratio is 0.275, for which steam turb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>cogeneration</strong> seems<br />

suitable. Four alternatives are considered for the analysis, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g steam turb<strong>in</strong>e us<strong>in</strong>g coal,<br />

reciprocat<strong>in</strong>g eng<strong>in</strong>e us<strong>in</strong>g fuel oil, <strong>and</strong> gas turb<strong>in</strong>e us<strong>in</strong>g natural gas. The results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

analysis for this company are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4.5.<br />

Alternative 1 seems to be the most attractive option s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>its</strong> IRR <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment cost are the<br />

lowest among the four alternatives considered. The ma<strong>in</strong> advantage <strong>of</strong> this alternative is<br />

derived from the use <strong>of</strong> coal, which is a cheap fuel. However, it can satisfy a little more than<br />

30 per cent <strong>of</strong> the company’s electricity dem<strong>and</strong>. Alternative 2 can take care <strong>of</strong> all the power<br />

<strong>and</strong> heat dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the factory but <strong>its</strong> IRR is the lowest <strong>and</strong> <strong>its</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment cost is the<br />

highest among the four alternatives.<br />

Alternative 3 is also very attractive but <strong>its</strong> IRR is lower <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment cost is higher than<br />

those for the first alternative.<br />

The alternative 4 can also meet all the energy needs <strong>of</strong> the site <strong>and</strong> has a fairly high IRR but<br />

natural gas is presently not available at the site.<br />

4.3.4 Paper mill “D”<br />

This is a big paper mill <strong>in</strong> Dông Nai prov<strong>in</strong>ce, with a capacity to produce 170 tons <strong>of</strong> paper per<br />

day. The factory has a condens<strong>in</strong>g steam turb<strong>in</strong>e power generator but it is not used. The<br />

company functions dur<strong>in</strong>g 3 shifts per day, 300 days per year. It is presently connected to the<br />

national grid to take care <strong>of</strong> all <strong>its</strong> power needs. The power supply reliability is essential for<br />

the company for <strong>its</strong> production process. Self-generation with <strong>in</strong>terconnection to the national<br />

grid could be a good solution for the company <strong>in</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g difficult situation <strong>of</strong> the power<br />

sector.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the electricity <strong>and</strong> steam consumption data allows to conclude the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• Total Annual Electricity Consumption: 48,645 MWh<br />

• Maximum Electricity Dem<strong>and</strong>: 7.66 MW<br />

• M<strong>in</strong>imum Electricity Dem<strong>and</strong>: 3.84 MW<br />

• Total Annual Fuel Oil Consumption: 13.8 million litres<br />

• Total Annual Steam Use: 164,721 tons<br />

• Maximum Steam Dem<strong>and</strong>: 29.1 tons/hr<br />

• M<strong>in</strong>imum Steam Dem<strong>and</strong>: 11.1 ton/hr<br />

With an average power-to-heat ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.39 for the factory, the steam turb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>cogeneration</strong><br />

configuration seems the most suitable. The analysis for the Paper Company “D” was done<br />

with three configurations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g steam turb<strong>in</strong>e, reciprocat<strong>in</strong>g eng<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> gas turb<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>in</strong><br />

order to make a comparison. The results <strong>of</strong> the analysis for this company are shown <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

4.6.<br />

Among the above four alternatives, Alternative 2 seems to be the best s<strong>in</strong>ce it gives a high<br />

IRR <strong>and</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g fuel supply availability <strong>in</strong>to consideration. The alternative 4 with natural gas as<br />

fuel seems to be the most attractive option but natural gas is not presently available at the<br />

site.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!