part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> projects implemented <strong>in</strong> Asia 71<br />
The total electricity dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the factory was 59,000 MWh/year, with an average dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
around 6.7 MW. The actual dem<strong>and</strong> varied between a m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>of</strong> 5.9 MW <strong>and</strong> a maximum <strong>of</strong><br />
8.9 MW. About 1 MW <strong>of</strong> electricity represent<strong>in</strong>g 15 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total dem<strong>and</strong> was selfgenerated,<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g more than 20 years old diesel generators.<br />
Four alternatives were considered dur<strong>in</strong>g the feasibility study <strong>and</strong> compared with the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
situation: (1) Back pressure steam turb<strong>in</strong>e, (2) Gas turb<strong>in</strong>e, (3) Comb<strong>in</strong>ed cycle, (4) Diesel<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>e. In all cases, the criteria set was to meet the peak steam dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the factory, i.e.,<br />
17 tons/hour.<br />
2.3.2 Option 1: back pressure steam turb<strong>in</strong>e<br />
The proposed option is schematically shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.2. This option was found to be not<br />
attractive due to the need for extract<strong>in</strong>g steam at two different pressures. The vary<strong>in</strong>g dem<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> steam at these pressures will lead to quite unfavourable steam turb<strong>in</strong>e operation. In steam<br />
match<strong>in</strong>g option, the net output would be only 0.8 MW, which is less than the current st<strong>and</strong>by<br />
needs.<br />
Moreover, the unavailability <strong>of</strong> a suitable st<strong>and</strong>ard turb<strong>in</strong>e will lead to high <strong>in</strong>stallation cost <strong>and</strong><br />
will be more difficult to operate <strong>in</strong> practice. Consider<strong>in</strong>g 40 per cent <strong>of</strong> custom duty <strong>and</strong> tax,<br />
the <strong>in</strong>vestment was calculated as US$ 7,500/kW. The annual ma<strong>in</strong>tenance cost was<br />
estimated as 3 per cent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>vestment, i.e., US$ 180,000/year.<br />
130 c C, 12.73 t/h, (1.93 MW)<br />
Fuel<br />
10.6 MW<br />
Water: 70 o C<br />
11.5 t/h,<br />
(0.94 MW)<br />
Boiler<br />
η= 90%<br />
Figure 2.2 Steam turb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>cogeneration</strong> option for the textile mill<br />
2.3.3 Option 2: gas turb<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Steam: 100 bar/450 o C<br />
12.73 t/h (11.47 MW)<br />
Steam: 12 bar/237 o C<br />
1.23 t/h (0.99 MW)<br />
Electricity<br />
800 kW<br />
Steam to Process<br />
12 bar/237 o C<br />
6 t/h (4.84 MW)<br />
56 bar/380 o C<br />
5.5 t/h (4.79 MW)<br />
The schematic diagram <strong>of</strong> this option is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.3. The system <strong>in</strong>cluded a diesel<br />
fired gas turb<strong>in</strong>e with heat recovery steam boiler <strong>and</strong> an option for auxiliary fir<strong>in</strong>g to meet the<br />
vary<strong>in</strong>g steam dem<strong>and</strong>s. A boiler bypass would allow the gas turb<strong>in</strong>e to run at full load, <strong>and</strong><br />
the auxiliary fir<strong>in</strong>g option with heavy fuel oil will let the boiler run at full load even when the gas<br />
turb<strong>in</strong>e is shut down. The net output <strong>of</strong> the alternator would be 4.7 MW, <strong>and</strong> assum<strong>in</strong>g a 90<br />
per cent availability factor, the <strong>cogeneration</strong> plant was capable <strong>of</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g 58 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
power needs <strong>of</strong> the factory, the rest be<strong>in</strong>g purchased from the utility grid.<br />
ST<br />
G