07.04.2013 Views

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Policy framework for promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cogeneration</strong> 45<br />

to be used <strong>in</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> systems should avail duty-free or low duty benef<strong>its</strong>. Several<br />

countries <strong>in</strong> Asia have already adopted a number <strong>of</strong> these measures <strong>in</strong> their efforts to<br />

encourage efficient energy generation <strong>and</strong> utilization. For example, the government <strong>of</strong> India<br />

has listed a number <strong>of</strong> energy generat<strong>in</strong>g devices which are eligible to apply for reduced<br />

import taxes <strong>and</strong> duties, accelerated depreciation, <strong>in</strong>come tax holiday, capital <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

subsidy, etc. (for more details, please see Part II, Chapter 1).<br />

In Europe, a<strong>part</strong> from the national <strong>in</strong>centives given to private companies, there are several<br />

European Union energy programmes that provide grants to encourage <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> energy<br />

efficiency (e.g. JOULE, THERMIE). The concept <strong>of</strong> third <strong>part</strong>y f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g is strongly supported<br />

by the European Commission <strong>in</strong> order to help companies f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong>vestment without<br />

affect<strong>in</strong>g their balance sheets. Projects suitable for third <strong>part</strong>y f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g can get assistance<br />

from the SAVE programme <strong>and</strong> the Technology Performance F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g (TPF) system<br />

developed under the SPRING programme <strong>of</strong> the European Commission.<br />

4.3.5 Role <strong>of</strong> electric utilities<br />

A factor <strong>of</strong> prime importance appears to be an adequate def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>and</strong> activity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the electric utility. There is a trend across the globe for liberalization, restructur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />

gradual dis<strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> the traditional vertical energy supply monopolies. Some Asian<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g countries are already envisag<strong>in</strong>g to separate the production <strong>and</strong> distribution<br />

operation <strong>of</strong> the vertically <strong>in</strong>tegrated utilities. The emphasis should be clearly to br<strong>in</strong>g forth<br />

progressive changes <strong>in</strong> the utilities so that they gradually become suppliers <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

services.<br />

The public <strong>and</strong> monopolistic natures <strong>of</strong> electric utilities <strong>in</strong> many develop<strong>in</strong>g countries lead to<br />

subsidized price <strong>of</strong> electricity <strong>and</strong> improper tariff structures that h<strong>in</strong>der the promotion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>cogeneration</strong> systems. The electric tariff should be acceptable to all <strong>part</strong>ies concerned <strong>and</strong><br />

not protect the <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>of</strong> any specific entity. For projects with long term commitments, the<br />

tariff structures should reflect the long-run marg<strong>in</strong>al cost <strong>of</strong> electricity generated. There<br />

should be rules <strong>and</strong> regulations for the sale <strong>and</strong> buy-back rates for electric utilities <strong>and</strong><br />

cogenerators; the latter should get benef<strong>its</strong> for their <strong>in</strong>stalled capacities <strong>and</strong> exported<br />

electricity based on the avoided costs <strong>of</strong> electric utilities.<br />

The active <strong>and</strong> supportive role <strong>of</strong> electric utilities <strong>in</strong> different forms, such as promotional<br />

activities on behalf <strong>of</strong> cogenerator, <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> schemes, establishment <strong>of</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures<br />

<strong>and</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g up conducive tariff structures, can be crucial to the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong>.<br />

For example, utility owned <strong>cogeneration</strong> is quite common <strong>in</strong> Denmark <strong>and</strong> Germany that have<br />

a long record <strong>of</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g district-heat<strong>in</strong>g networks. In countries like the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> Great Brita<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (United K<strong>in</strong>gdom), jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures<br />

have been established between utility <strong>and</strong> cogenerator. Similar <strong>in</strong>itiatives have also been<br />

taken <strong>in</strong> Japan, Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea <strong>and</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />

A contentious issue related to private <strong>part</strong>icipation <strong>in</strong> power generation is the decision on<br />

fix<strong>in</strong>g the new capacity that should be added. Capacity plann<strong>in</strong>g should not only have<br />

representation from government <strong>and</strong> electricity producers <strong>and</strong> distributors, the <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong><br />

those will<strong>in</strong>g to contribute to decentralized power generation <strong>and</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong>, should also<br />

be protected. The procedure applied should be fair <strong>and</strong> transparent, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account<br />

factors such as cost-effectiveness, location <strong>of</strong> the plant, environmental benef<strong>its</strong>, etc. If a<br />

<strong>cogeneration</strong> facility shows the same economic promise as a conventional power plant, it is<br />

obvious that the former should be given a priority.<br />

The idea <strong>of</strong> the power utilities implement<strong>in</strong>g a competitive bid process seems the right<br />

approach to determ<strong>in</strong>e the realizable potential for <strong>cogeneration</strong>. This helps to avoid situations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the supply <strong>of</strong> power greatly exceed<strong>in</strong>g the dem<strong>and</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!