07.04.2013 Views

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34 Part I: Overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>its</strong> <strong>status</strong> <strong>in</strong> Asia<br />

0<br />

A1 A2 An = - Io+ + +.....+ +<br />

S<br />

(1+IRR) (1+IRR) 2 (1+IRR) n (1+IRR) n<br />

Manual computation <strong>of</strong> IRR is generally an iterative process. One starts with an assumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> the rate first <strong>and</strong> calculates the net present value <strong>of</strong> the cash flow stream. If the net present<br />

value is negative, the process is repeated with a lower assumed IRR. The iterative process<br />

would be repeated until the net present value becomes zero (or nearly zero). However, many<br />

personal computer spreadsheet programs <strong>and</strong> some h<strong>and</strong>-held f<strong>in</strong>ancial calculators have the<br />

ability to compute IRR from a stream <strong>of</strong> cash flows.<br />

To judge the suitability <strong>of</strong> a <strong>cogeneration</strong> project, comparison is made between IRR <strong>and</strong><br />

discount rate (or required m<strong>in</strong>imum rate). If IRR happens to be less than the discount rate,<br />

the project would be rejected.<br />

3.6 Assessment <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Cogeneration Projects<br />

Once a client is satisfied with the rough payback period <strong>of</strong> a specific <strong>cogeneration</strong> project, a<br />

common <strong>and</strong> simple procedure <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial feasibility <strong>of</strong> that <strong>part</strong>icular alternative may be<br />

pursued, as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.2.<br />

Cost Data <strong>of</strong><br />

the System<br />

Estimate<br />

NPV<br />

Is<br />

NPV > 0<br />

Yes<br />

Estimate<br />

IRR<br />

Is<br />

IRR>Expected<br />

Rate<br />

Yes<br />

Accept the<br />

System<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

Parameters<br />

Figure 3.2 Flowchart <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> feasibility analysis<br />

In the estimation <strong>of</strong> NPV for a <strong>cogeneration</strong> project, the total <strong>in</strong>vestment costs are taken as<br />

cash outflows, <strong>and</strong> cash <strong>in</strong>flows are the difference between the annual total cost <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>cogeneration</strong> system <strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the conventional energy supplies.<br />

Sometimes, the total discounted costs <strong>of</strong> different <strong>cogeneration</strong> alternatives are estimated<br />

<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> the NPV <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle alternative, e.g., the case <strong>of</strong> a grid <strong>in</strong>dependent project. All the<br />

cash outflows are considered <strong>and</strong> discounted to the present value. The option that has the<br />

least discounted costs would be selected as the best system.<br />

No<br />

No<br />

Reject the<br />

System

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!