part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
34 Part I: Overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>its</strong> <strong>status</strong> <strong>in</strong> Asia<br />
0<br />
A1 A2 An = - Io+ + +.....+ +<br />
S<br />
(1+IRR) (1+IRR) 2 (1+IRR) n (1+IRR) n<br />
Manual computation <strong>of</strong> IRR is generally an iterative process. One starts with an assumption<br />
<strong>of</strong> the rate first <strong>and</strong> calculates the net present value <strong>of</strong> the cash flow stream. If the net present<br />
value is negative, the process is repeated with a lower assumed IRR. The iterative process<br />
would be repeated until the net present value becomes zero (or nearly zero). However, many<br />
personal computer spreadsheet programs <strong>and</strong> some h<strong>and</strong>-held f<strong>in</strong>ancial calculators have the<br />
ability to compute IRR from a stream <strong>of</strong> cash flows.<br />
To judge the suitability <strong>of</strong> a <strong>cogeneration</strong> project, comparison is made between IRR <strong>and</strong><br />
discount rate (or required m<strong>in</strong>imum rate). If IRR happens to be less than the discount rate,<br />
the project would be rejected.<br />
3.6 Assessment <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Cogeneration Projects<br />
Once a client is satisfied with the rough payback period <strong>of</strong> a specific <strong>cogeneration</strong> project, a<br />
common <strong>and</strong> simple procedure <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial feasibility <strong>of</strong> that <strong>part</strong>icular alternative may be<br />
pursued, as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.2.<br />
Cost Data <strong>of</strong><br />
the System<br />
Estimate<br />
NPV<br />
Is<br />
NPV > 0<br />
Yes<br />
Estimate<br />
IRR<br />
Is<br />
IRR>Expected<br />
Rate<br />
Yes<br />
Accept the<br />
System<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
Parameters<br />
Figure 3.2 Flowchart <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> feasibility analysis<br />
In the estimation <strong>of</strong> NPV for a <strong>cogeneration</strong> project, the total <strong>in</strong>vestment costs are taken as<br />
cash outflows, <strong>and</strong> cash <strong>in</strong>flows are the difference between the annual total cost <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>cogeneration</strong> system <strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the conventional energy supplies.<br />
Sometimes, the total discounted costs <strong>of</strong> different <strong>cogeneration</strong> alternatives are estimated<br />
<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> the NPV <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle alternative, e.g., the case <strong>of</strong> a grid <strong>in</strong>dependent project. All the<br />
cash outflows are considered <strong>and</strong> discounted to the present value. The option that has the<br />
least discounted costs would be selected as the best system.<br />
No<br />
No<br />
Reject the<br />
System