part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Summary <strong>of</strong> country study – Bangladesh 152<br />
Table 3.9 Summary <strong>of</strong> pre-feasibility study <strong>of</strong> the hospital<br />
Major Parameters Steam Turb<strong>in</strong>e Gas Eng<strong>in</strong>e Gas Turb<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Ther<br />
mal<br />
Match<br />
Power<br />
Match<br />
Thermal<br />
Match<br />
Power<br />
Match<br />
Therm<br />
al<br />
Match<br />
Powe<br />
r<br />
Match<br />
Installed power (kW) 321.00 800.00 4,916.00 800.00 2,104.00 800.00<br />
Fuel consumption (TJ/year) 111.90 279.10 485.60 79.00 252.10 95.60<br />
Electricity generated (MWh) 2,668.00 6,658.00 40,9111.00 6,058.00 17,509.00 6,658.00<br />
Heat generated (TJ/year) 89.50 22,308.00 89.50 14.60 89.60 34.00<br />
Excess/deficit(-) power (MWh/year) -4,440.00 -450.00 33,8030.00 -450.00 10,401.00 -450.00<br />
Excess/deficit(-) heat (TJ/year) -2.00 109.60 -2.00 -76.90 2.00 -57.60<br />
Equipment power-to-heat ratio 0.107 0.11 1.870 1.87 .80 0.80<br />
Total <strong>in</strong>vestment (million Taka) 18.47 46.08 212.370 34.56 100.99 38.40<br />
Net present value (million Taka) 25.55 33.32 306.070 69.86 137.00 66.51<br />
IRR (per cent) 35.20 26.00 35.90 43.50 34.80 39.80<br />
With gas turb<strong>in</strong>e thermal match (GTTM) option, about 146 per cent excess electricity is<br />
generated, which has to be sold as <strong>in</strong> the RETM option. Gas turb<strong>in</strong>e power match (GTPM)<br />
option takes care <strong>of</strong> all the power needs though heat deficit is as high as 60 per cent. This<br />
will require the adoption <strong>of</strong> auxiliary natural gas fir<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the recovery boiler.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the sensitivity analysis carried out to see the impacts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment, fuel <strong>and</strong> electricity price escalation, was limited to REPM <strong>and</strong> GTPM options.<br />
What if the <strong>in</strong>vestment cost <strong>in</strong>creases?<br />
Internal Rate <strong>of</strong> Return<br />
(IRR)<br />
42%<br />
40%<br />
38%<br />
36%<br />
34%<br />
32%<br />
30%<br />
What if the fuel price escalates faster?<br />
Internal Rate <strong>of</strong> Return<br />
41%<br />
40%<br />
39%<br />
38%<br />
37%<br />
36%<br />
35%<br />
REPM<br />
GTPM<br />
1% 3% 5% 8% 10% 13% 15%<br />
% <strong>of</strong> Increase Investment Cost<br />
REPM<br />
GTPM<br />
5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 11% 12% 13%<br />
Fuel Price Escalation Rate