part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
part 1: overview of cogeneration and its status in asia - Fire
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
68 Part II: Cogeneration experiences <strong>in</strong> Asia <strong>and</strong> elsewhere<br />
undisturbed operation <strong>of</strong> several power consumers <strong>in</strong> the plant dur<strong>in</strong>g any unexpected tripp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
by draw<strong>in</strong>g power automatically as <strong>and</strong> when required up to the extent <strong>of</strong> 17.6 MVA.<br />
Consider<strong>in</strong>g longer outage <strong>of</strong> the <strong>cogeneration</strong> plant dur<strong>in</strong>g major overhauls or dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
recommended <strong>in</strong>spections, it was decided to <strong>in</strong>clude an additional captive power generation<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> 20 MW to guarantee power supply without depend<strong>in</strong>g on the public utility grid.<br />
Similarly, to avoid the problem <strong>of</strong> steam shortage dur<strong>in</strong>g the outage <strong>of</strong> heat recovery steam<br />
generators, an additional boiler was <strong>in</strong>cluded as a spare unit. This would also take care <strong>of</strong> the<br />
start-up constra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> the gas cracker plant when greater amount <strong>of</strong> steam was required than<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g normal operat<strong>in</strong>g conditions. Lean gas was considered as the sole fuel for operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the <strong>cogeneration</strong> unit. The results <strong>of</strong> the economic analysis, consider<strong>in</strong>g the prevail<strong>in</strong>g costs<br />
<strong>of</strong> equipment, fuel, O&M, manpower, etc., are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 2.1. The <strong>cogeneration</strong><br />
case has a clear edge over the exist<strong>in</strong>g case as it helps to reduce the energy bill by 36 per<br />
cent <strong>and</strong> improves the reliability <strong>of</strong> the production process.<br />
Table 2.1 Economic analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>cogeneration</strong> <strong>in</strong> the gas cracker complex<br />
Exist<strong>in</strong>g Situation:<br />
Process steam from conventional boiler <strong>and</strong> power purchase from utility grid<br />
Description Annual Cost<br />
Investment:<br />
Boilers (2 x 136 tons/hour <strong>of</strong> steam)<br />
Operat<strong>in</strong>g & Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance Costs:<br />
(US$/year)<br />
3,780.00<br />
Electricity purchased from the grid (50 MW)<br />
40,832.00<br />
Fuel gas (6,626 tons/hour)<br />
4,529.00<br />
Other utilities<br />
2,479.00<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance & Chemicals<br />
315.00<br />
Manpower<br />
336.00<br />
Total Costs (exist<strong>in</strong>g situation)<br />
52,271.00<br />
Steam cost (US$/ton)<br />
15.37<br />
Power cost (US$/MWh)<br />
Cogeneration Case:<br />
102.08<br />
Power <strong>and</strong> heat from the <strong>cogeneration</strong> plant, m<strong>in</strong>imum dem<strong>and</strong> contract with utility grid<br />
Investment:<br />
Boilers (3 x 136 tons/hour <strong>of</strong> steam)<br />
Gas turb<strong>in</strong>e generators (3 x 20.7 MW)<br />
Steam turb<strong>in</strong>e generator (25 MW)<br />
Operat<strong>in</strong>g & Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance Costs:<br />
18,267.00<br />
Dem<strong>and</strong> contract with the grid (17.6 MVA)<br />
754.00<br />
Fuel gas (15.148 tons/hour)<br />
10,355.00<br />
Other utilities<br />
1,862.00<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance & Chemicals<br />
1,720.00<br />
Manpower<br />
504.00<br />
Total Costs (<strong>cogeneration</strong> case)<br />
Steam cost (US$/ton)<br />
Power cost (US$/MWh)<br />
33,462.00<br />
12.30<br />
51.64