10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ecology and Beyond 103<br />

trade in the western Mediterranean they let the western Phoenicians<br />

and above all the Greeks play the main role. 23 Nevertheless,<br />

the Etruscans were fully up-to-date in agriculture and<br />

metal-working technology, and they could benefit from all<br />

the achievements <strong>of</strong> eastern and Greek civilizations. Thus the<br />

Etruscans could develop their own alphabet derived from the<br />

Greek, and fully participate in the artistic achievements <strong>of</strong><br />

the Orientalizing period. In different ways and at a different<br />

time, the cultures <strong>of</strong> Iberia also benefited from the impulse that<br />

gave them both the West-Phoenicians and the Greeks.<br />

This role <strong>of</strong> go-between people was not sufficient to ensure<br />

the Greeks an everlasting domination. Through conquest by<br />

Alexander, they managed to gain control over the eastern basin<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean—that is another story. But it was just then<br />

that a specific cycle <strong>of</strong> their culture, represented by the citystate,<br />

began to come to an end. In fact, it soon appeared that in<br />

this role <strong>of</strong> middlemen the Greeks were no longer needed; and<br />

the heritage <strong>of</strong> their specific city-state organization even proved<br />

to be a radical handicap when it came to competing with the<br />

territorial state that Rome developed in Italy. Then the two<br />

basins <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean were at last united and this time a<br />

general connectivity could come into being. At first this connectivity<br />

mainly benefited Rome and Italy, as both texts and<br />

archaeology testify. But under the Empire this one-sided situation<br />

changed. We now know that the Roman world was more<br />

‘multi-polarized’ than was previously thought, 24 though Rome<br />

and Italy long remained the centre. In any case this general<br />

connectivity in the Mediterranean world was not ‘the end <strong>of</strong><br />

History’: several very serious internal difficulties brought about<br />

a first crisis in the third century ad, then the final collapse in the<br />

fifth century <strong>of</strong> the western part <strong>of</strong> the empire.<br />

23 On the maritime contacts <strong>of</strong> the Phoenicians see A. Millard, ‘The Phoenicians<br />

at Sea’, in G. J. Oliver, R. Brock, T. J. Cornell, and S. Hodkinson<br />

(eds.), The Sea in Antiquity (Oxford, 2000), 75–9; and, more generally, the<br />

articles in S. Moscati (ed.), The Phoenicians (Milan, 1988). On the Greek<br />

presence in the western basin <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean see the many different<br />

studies in the collective volume edited by Pugliese Carratelli.<br />

24 K. Hopkins, ‘Rome, Taxes, Rents and Trade’, Kodai 6–7 (1995/6),<br />

41–75; H. W. Pleket, ‘Models and Inscriptions: Export <strong>of</strong> Textiles in the<br />

Roman Empire’, Epigraphica Anatolica 30 (1998), 117–28.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!