10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

372 Four Years <strong>of</strong> Corruption<br />

we do think that our focus on the microecological aspect <strong>of</strong> any<br />

such phenomenon <strong>of</strong>fers one way forward—one <strong>of</strong> many. We are<br />

not, by the same token, intentionally ‘reductionist’, seeing pilgrimage<br />

as ‘just connectivity in disguise’ (Squatriti 2002: 275–6,<br />

our italics; compare CS 445). Connectivity helps us to understand<br />

pilgrimage (and vice versa) even though pilgrimage must<br />

always be interpreted in the light <strong>of</strong> the relevant theology and<br />

eschatology. 42 A far more telling and accurate criticism here is<br />

made by Fentress and Fentress (2001: 218–19). We need to<br />

address the question <strong>of</strong> why topography is enshrined in religious<br />

perceptions and rites in the ways we describe.<br />

Why should the practical, hard-working people <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean<br />

interrupt their cabotage in order to translate their topological knowledge<br />

into flights <strong>of</strong> mythological fancy, unless, <strong>of</strong> course . . . by reinscribing<br />

their topological knowledge in this manner, they were<br />

preserving it in ways that made more sense to them—more socially<br />

meaningful and easier to remember? . . . Sacred landscapes are loci <strong>of</strong><br />

social memory relating communities to their real or mythological<br />

history.<br />

8. render unto caesar: in quest <strong>of</strong> narrative<br />

Fentress and Fentress argue that our religious history should<br />

have taken account <strong>of</strong> diachronic variables, and the point can be<br />

generalized. It can be turned into a judgement <strong>of</strong> CS that brings<br />

together a number <strong>of</strong> criticisms rehearsed above and adds a few<br />

more. The overall judgement is that the book lacks a narrative.<br />

This is a judgement that we take very seriously—so much so,<br />

indeed, that we are not going to respond to it here. This is<br />

because the scale <strong>of</strong> any adequate response would be too large<br />

for the present context and we are not yet ready to make it. We<br />

hope to <strong>of</strong>fer something more considered in LC. Meanwhile,<br />

our task, and our interim contribution to the debate, is to try to<br />

characterize our omission.<br />

First, the underlying point seems to be that we have not<br />

clearly enough integrated cultural variables at the particular<br />

points at which they are drawn into our account <strong>of</strong> microecol-<br />

42<br />

Cf. McCormick, Origins, part II generally, for pilgrimage as an index <strong>of</strong><br />

connectivity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!