10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Four Years <strong>of</strong> Corruption 351<br />

trying to detect is scarcely revealed by what little <strong>of</strong> this research<br />

illuminates the dark seventh-to eighth-century core <strong>of</strong><br />

the Pirenne period. 4 Finally, the supposed tendency <strong>of</strong> pirates<br />

<strong>of</strong> the period to raid inland riverine settlements, rather than to<br />

behave as Barbary corsairs on the open sea, is taken as undermining<br />

our use <strong>of</strong> piracy as an index <strong>of</strong> connectivity (wrongly, as<br />

more recent and more detailed and recent research has shown). 5<br />

And that is all, even in the longest review by an early medievalist.<br />

Our interpretation <strong>of</strong> the evidence for continued Mediterranean<br />

‘connectivity’ in the early Middle Ages is ignored<br />

altogether by Richard Hodges, the reviewer from whom we<br />

had expected some sharp dissent because we disagree with his<br />

rightly influential refashioning <strong>of</strong> ‘the Pirenne thesis’. 6 Edward<br />

Peters, a ‘high’ medievalist, does embrace the early Middle<br />

Ages in his review, but he still does not have much space for it<br />

because he reviews CS alongside Michael McCormick’s vast<br />

and impressive Origins <strong>of</strong> the European Economy: Communications<br />

and Commerce AD 300–900. It is a strange and irritating<br />

coincidence that this important work should come out so soon<br />

after CS that no debate could take place between McCormick<br />

and ourselves about our assertion <strong>of</strong> ‘connectivity maintained’<br />

across the seventh and early eighth centuries, an assertion that<br />

has obvious repercussions for McCormick’s discerning the<br />

‘early growth <strong>of</strong> the European economy’ 7 during the Carolingian<br />

period rather than after it. Peters, however, does no more<br />

than mention our section on the early medieval depression, the<br />

‘Pirenne period’. This is presumably because—à la Pirenne—<br />

for him the Mediterranean economy has to ‘hit bottom’ (p. 50)<br />

in order for the northern European economy to come to life.<br />

And we are interpreted as portraying the Pirenne period as<br />

4<br />

Squatriti 271 n. 22 does not <strong>of</strong>fer a huge bibliography <strong>of</strong> what we missed.<br />

Compare CS 567–9.<br />

5<br />

Squatriti 272. Compare M. McCormick, Origins <strong>of</strong> the European Economy:<br />

Communications and Commerce AD 300–900 (Cambridge, 2001), 170,<br />

199, 233, 264, 428–9, 519, 768. McCormick’s dossier <strong>of</strong> early medieval travellers<br />

suggests that the dangers <strong>of</strong> pirates have been overestimated; but that<br />

does not affect our argument that open-sea piracy, quite clearly attested in the<br />

period, is some index <strong>of</strong> minimum levels <strong>of</strong> seafaring.<br />

6<br />

There is a brief but highly informed discussion in Fentress and Fentress<br />

215–17.<br />

7<br />

We allude to G. Duby’s 1974 monograph <strong>of</strong> that title (in translation).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!