10.04.2013 Views

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

Untitled - UTSC Humanities Research Projects server - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

354 Four Years <strong>of</strong> Corruption<br />

settlements or farmsteads, scores <strong>of</strong> microregions. We therefore<br />

eschewed the piling up <strong>of</strong> descriptions <strong>of</strong> individual estates or<br />

territories and their fortunes—descriptions that might have<br />

been drawn from field archaeology, from ancient inscriptions<br />

or literary texts, or from the later documentary record. Where<br />

we did display four localities as examples (chapter III), survey<br />

contributed heavily and explicitly to our analysis. We note that<br />

to do justice to the data <strong>of</strong> survey can be hard even for archaeologists:<br />

a recent reviewer <strong>of</strong> a series on Mediterranean survey<br />

speaks <strong>of</strong> ‘archaeological method . . . demoted to a kind <strong>of</strong> anthropological<br />

geomorphology’. 15 His complaint is that by<br />

adopting a tightly focused and environmentally orientated survey<br />

technique, looking inwards at small areas, Mediterranean<br />

survey archaeology elucidates large interaction less well than do<br />

the techniques and models used by archaeologists working in<br />

Asia and America, and does not amount to proper regional<br />

analysis. We hope at least to have avoided such introversion.<br />

On the archaeological front, our major regret is that Barry<br />

Cunliffe’s Facing the Ocean, like McCormick’s monograph, was<br />

not published either a little earlier than CS, so that we could<br />

draw parallels and contrasts between his Atlantic world and our<br />

Mediterranean, or a little later, so that Cunliffe could have<br />

included some response to CS. Cunliffe’s mode <strong>of</strong> exposition<br />

is different from our own. But we share a stress on the primacy<br />

<strong>of</strong> responses to the sea and ease <strong>of</strong> communications across it as<br />

combining to generate coherent zones throughout long<br />

stretches <strong>of</strong> prehistory and history; and the European Atlantic<br />

periphery, as Cunliffe maps it, is our western neighbour. In that<br />

basic geographical sense, we are not in conflict. We wish only<br />

that Cunliffe had gone further chronologically. It remains to<br />

build bridges between Cunliffe’s archaeological vision, which<br />

does not seek to elucidate periods more recent than 1500,<br />

and the increasingly lively early modern historiography <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Atlantic. 16<br />

15 R. E. Blanton, ‘Mediterranean Myopia’, Antiquity 74 (2001), 629.<br />

16 D. Armitage, ‘Three Concepts <strong>of</strong> Atlantic History’, in id. and<br />

M. J. Braddick (eds.), The British Atlantic World, 1500–1800 (Basingstoke<br />

and New York, 2002), 11–27; O. Ribeiro, Portugal, o Mediterrâneo e o Atlântico:<br />

esboço de relações geográficas, 4th edn. (Lisbon, 1986).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!