18.07.2013 Views

PDF (PhD Thesis Susan Chipchase) - Nottingham eTheses ...

PDF (PhD Thesis Susan Chipchase) - Nottingham eTheses ...

PDF (PhD Thesis Susan Chipchase) - Nottingham eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Retrieval phase:<br />

Participants then completed two examples of the retrieval task with<br />

target stimuli from the practice study phase. In each test trial participants were<br />

shown a pair of photographs. One member of the pair (‘the target’) was from<br />

the earlier RSVP, the other member of the pair (‘the distractor’) was from the<br />

corresponding unexposed set. The target and distractor were matched for<br />

valence and arousal. In Experiment 1A participants were asked which picture<br />

they preferred. Participants had to choose the left or the right photograph by<br />

pressing ‘1’ or ‘9’ respectively on the keyboard. The test question and response<br />

keys were shown under each pair of photographs. After the practice examples,<br />

participants completed the test phase for the first valence block. There were 30<br />

test trials for each valence block. Each photo was shown only once in the test<br />

phase. The pair of photos was shown side by side, with the location of the old<br />

item chosen at random. There was a new random order of test trials for each<br />

participant.<br />

After completing the test phase for the first valence block, participants<br />

were shown the study phase for the second valence block. This was in the same<br />

format as the first valence block. Participants then completed the test phase for<br />

the second valence block (but without any example tasks). Participants were<br />

then shown the study phase for the third valence block and then completed the<br />

test phase for the third valence block. The order of the valence blocks of<br />

positive, negative or neutral stimuli was counterbalanced across participants.<br />

Participants were debriefed and thanked for their participation.<br />

Experiment 1B was identical, except that the subjects were asked to<br />

perform a recognition judgement instead of a preference judgement. No<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!