18.07.2013 Views

csefh - Kinder-Umwelt-Gesundheit

csefh - Kinder-Umwelt-Gesundheit

csefh - Kinder-Umwelt-Gesundheit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

corresponded to the 24 hour period from noon on<br />

Monday to noon on Tuesday. Based on these<br />

definitions, the food soil equivalent was subtracted<br />

from the fecal soil equivalent to obtain an estimate of<br />

soil ingestion for a trace element. A daily overall<br />

ingestion estimate was constructed for each child as the<br />

median of trace element values remaining after tracers<br />

falling outside of a defined range around the overall<br />

median were excluded.<br />

Table 5-17 presents adjusted estimates,<br />

modified according to the input/output misalignment<br />

correction, of mean daily soil ingestion per child<br />

(mg/day) for the 64 study participants. The approach<br />

adopted in this paper led to changes in ingestion<br />

estimates from those presented in Calabrese et al.<br />

(1989).<br />

Estimates of children’s soil ingestion projected<br />

over a period of 365 days were derived by fitting lognormal<br />

distributions to the overall daily soil ingestion<br />

estimates using estimates modified according to the<br />

input/output misalignment correction (Table 5-18). The<br />

estimated median value of the 64 respondents' daily soil<br />

ingestion averaged over a year was 75 mg/day, while<br />

the 95 th percentile was 1,751 mg/day. In developing the<br />

365-day soil ingestion estimates, data that were<br />

obtained over a short period of time (as is the case with<br />

all available soil ingestion studies) were extrapolated<br />

over a year. The 2-week study period may not reflect<br />

variability in tracer element ingestion over a year.<br />

While Stanek and Calabrese (1995a) attempted to<br />

address this through modeling of the long term<br />

ingestion, new uncertainties were introduced through<br />

the parametric modeling of the limited subject day data.<br />

5.3.5.4 Calabrese and Stanek, 1992b - What<br />

Proportion of Household Dust is Derived<br />

from Outdoor Soil?<br />

Calabrese and Stanek (1992b) estimated the<br />

amount of outdoor soil in indoor dust using statistical<br />

modeling. The model used soil and dust data from the<br />

60 households that participated in the Calabrese et al.<br />

(1989) study, by preparing scatter plots of each tracer’s<br />

concentration in soil versus dust. Correlation analysis<br />

of the scatter plots was performed. The scatter plots<br />

showed little evidence of a consistent relationship<br />

between outdoor soil and indoor dust concentrations.<br />

The model estimated the proportion of outdoor soil in<br />

indoor dust using the simplifying assumption that the<br />

following variables were constants in all houses: the<br />

amount of dust produced every day from both indoor<br />

Child-Specific Exposure Factors Handbook<br />

Chapter 5 - Ingestion of Soil and Dust<br />

and outdoor sources; the proportion of indoor dust due<br />

to outdoor soil; and the concentration of the tracer<br />

element in dust produced from indoor sources. Using<br />

these assumptions, the model predicted that 31.3<br />

percent by weight of indoor dust came from outdoor<br />

soil. This model was then used to adjust the soil<br />

ingestion estimates from Calabrese et al. (1989). Using<br />

an assumption that 50 percent of excess fecal tracers<br />

were from indoor origin and 50 percent were from<br />

outdoor origin, and multiplying the 50 percent indoororigin<br />

excess fecal tracer by the model prediction that<br />

31.3 percent of indoor dust came from outdoor soil,<br />

results in an estimate that 15 percent of excess fecal<br />

tracers were from soil materials that were present in<br />

indoor dust. Adding this 15 percent to the 50 percent<br />

assumed outdoor (soil) origin excess fecal tracer<br />

quantity results in an estimate that approximately 65<br />

percent of the total residual excess fecal tracer was of<br />

soil origin (Calabrese and Stanek, 1992b).<br />

5.3.5.5 Calabrese et al., 1996 - Methodology to<br />

Estimate the Amount and Particle Size of<br />

Soil Ingested by Children: Implications for<br />

Exposure Assessment at Waste Sites<br />

Calabrese et al., 1996 examined the hypothesis<br />

that one cause of the variation between tracers seen in<br />

soil ingestion studies could be related to differences in<br />

soil tracer concentrations by particle size. This study,<br />

published prior to the Calabrese et al. (1997a) primary<br />

analysis study results, used laboratory analytical results<br />

for the Anaconda, Montana soil’s tracer concentration<br />

after it had been sieved to a particle size of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!